These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8184066)

  • 1. Intravenous use of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in children.
    Cohen MD; Smith JA
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):793-4. PubMed ID: 8184066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk: randomized trial.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; McDonald JR; Hefferton DM; Reddy ER; McManamon PJ
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 1549654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.
    Cochran ST; Bomyea K; Sayre JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1385-8. PubMed ID: 11373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.
    Yamaguchi K; Katayama H; Takashima T; Kozuka T; Seez P; Matsuura K
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 1987594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Adverse reactions to contrast media for intravenous use. A comparison between ionic and nonionic media].
    Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; Rodríguez R
    Rev Med Panama; 1995; 20(1-2):20-4. PubMed ID: 7480899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast media reactions and extravasation: relationship to intravenous injection rates.
    Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Langlotz CP
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):411-6. PubMed ID: 9807567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of contrast media use in southeastern U.S. hospitals.
    Utter DP
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 9170181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonionic iodinated intravenous contrast material-related reactions: incidence in large urban children's hospital--retrospective analysis of data in 12,494 patients.
    Callahan MJ; Poznauskis L; Zurakowski D; Taylor GA
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):674-81. PubMed ID: 19244041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and nonionic CT contrast media during rapid bolus injection.
    Federle MP; Chang PJ; Confer S; Ozgun B
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):637-40. PubMed ID: 9494479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
    Wolf GL; Arenson RL; Cross AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolal contrast media.
    Mikkonen R; Kontkanen T; Kivisaari L
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 7833173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient allergies: role in selective use of nonionic contrast material.
    Halpern JD; Hopper KD; Arredondo MG; Trautlein JJ
    Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 8668778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nephrotoxicity from contrast material in renal insufficiency: ionic versus nonionic agents.
    Harris KG; Smith TP; Cragg AH; Lemke JH
    Radiology; 1991 Jun; 179(3):849-52. PubMed ID: 2028004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adverse reactions to contrast media in CT: effects of temperature and ionic property.
    Vergara M; Seguel S
    Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 8668779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP; Moore RD; Powe NR; Gopalan R; Davidoff AJ; Litt M; Graziano S; Brinker JA
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with metrizamide in patients with previous severe anaphylactoid reactions to ionic contrast agents.
    Rapoport S; Bookstein JJ; Higgins CB; Carey PH; Sovak M; Lasser EC
    Radiology; 1982 May; 143(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 7071332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.