These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8184077)

  • 1. Exposure rates during special procedures with C-arm type fluoroscopic systems.
    Glaze S; Wagner LK; Archer BR; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):849-52. PubMed ID: 8184077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluoroscopy: recording of fluoroscopic images and automatic exposure control.
    Geise RA
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 11158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where should we measure the entrance air kerma rate during acceptance testing of the automatic dose control of a fluoroscopic system?
    Fukuda A; Miyati T; Matsubara K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 23413079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation exposure in hand surgery: mini versus standard C-arm.
    Athwal GS; Bueno RA; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 30(6):1310-6. PubMed ID: 16344194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol for measurement of patient entrance surface dose rates for fluoroscopic X-ray equipment.
    Martin CJ; Sutton DG; Workman A; Shaw AJ; Temperton D
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 71(852):1283-7. PubMed ID: 10319002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation exposure with use of the inverted-c-arm technique in upper-extremity surgery.
    Tremains MR; Georgiadis GM; Dennis MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 May; 83(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 11379736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluoroscopic examination in the neonatal intensive care unit using an inverted C-arm.
    ter Meulen DC; Blickman JG; Cranley WR; O'Connor JF
    Pediatr Radiol; 1998 Nov; 28(11):887-9. PubMed ID: 9799325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equipment performance and radiation protection status in X-ray fluoroscopy units in Sudan.
    Ahmed NA; Nayl AI; Suliman II
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 21317144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation.
    Giordano BD; Baumhauer JF; Morgan TL; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1970-6. PubMed ID: 18665022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.
    Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15933129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control.
    Reilly AJ; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):938-48. PubMed ID: 11675312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiotherapy verification film for estimating cumulative entrance skin exposure for fluoroscopic examinations.
    Geise RA; Ansel HJ
    Health Phys; 1990 Sep; 59(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 2394586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.
    Mahesh M
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(4):1033-45. PubMed ID: 11452079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Initial experiences with pulsed fluoroscopy on a multifunctional fluoroscopic unit].
    Herrmann K; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Schätzl M; Allmendinger H; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 8998321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice of phantom material and test protocols to determine radiation exposure rates for fluoroscopy.
    Anderson JA; Wang J; Clarke GD
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1033-42. PubMed ID: 10903693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Chida K; Fuda K; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):115-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 17139653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units.
    Bor D; Toklu T; Olğar T; Sancak T; Cekirge S; Onal B; Bilgiç S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 16718424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation exposure to angiographers under different fluoroscopic imaging conditions.
    Boone JM; Levin DC
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):861-5. PubMed ID: 1871307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of fluoroscopic equipment in Victoria.
    Boal TJ; Dessent KW; Facci M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Dec; 21(4):161-9. PubMed ID: 10050346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.