108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8185033)
21. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of changing from annual to biennial mammographic screening on breast cancer outcomes in women aged 50-79 in British Columbia.
Coldman AJ; Phillips N; Olivotto IA; Gordon P; Warren L; Kan L
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 19106258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Burhenne HJ
CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):875-6; author reply 880-3. PubMed ID: 8448695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Re: Interval breast cancers in the screening mammography program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1298-9. PubMed ID: 7717258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modelling mammography screening for breast cancer in the Canadian context: Modification and testing of a microsimulation model.
Yaffe MJ; Mittmann N; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Stout NK
Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):3-8. PubMed ID: 26676233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Canadian test screens mammogram readers.
Wagner SK
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 10150904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Recruiting older women for screening mammography.
Halabi S; Vogel VG; Bondy ML; Vernon SW
Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 8402722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Chen Y; Roman M; Lee CI
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 29239711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammography screening: how far is too far?
Osmun WE; Copeland J; Boisvert L
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(1):2149. PubMed ID: 23406261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast screening in north India: a cost-effective cancer prevention strategy.
Pandey S; Chandravati
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(2):853-7. PubMed ID: 23621251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Qualitative analysis on screening mammography compliance among middle-aged women in Puerto Rico].
Sańchez Ayéndez M; Davila AL; Bustillo M; Nazario CM; Larriuz MC; Martínez-Paz G
P R Health Sci J; 2002 Sep; 21(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 12243113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles.
Bastani R; Marcus AC; Maxwell AE; Das IP; Yan KX
Prev Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 8016038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Need for open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a specialist breast clinic service.
Curtin JJ; Sampson MA
BMJ; 1992 Feb; 304(6826):549-51. PubMed ID: 1559063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently.
Dee KE; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):729-33. PubMed ID: 11222214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Trends in mammography 1991-96 and the impact of nationwide screening in The Netherlands.
van Leiden HA; van Gessel-Dabekaussen AA; van der Maas PJ; de Koning HJ
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10444728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
