108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8185033)
41. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography.
Weaver DL; Rosenberg RD; Barlow WE; Ichikawa L; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Geller BM; Key CR; Maygarden SJ; Ballard-Barbash R
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):732-42. PubMed ID: 16411214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.
Roman M; Hubbard RA; Sebuodegard S; Miglioretti DL; Castells X; Hofvind S
Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3952-8. PubMed ID: 23963877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading in digital mammography screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Posso M; Puig T; Carles M; Rué M; Canelo-Aybar C; Bonfill X
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():40-49. PubMed ID: 29103474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes.
Coldman AJ; Major D; Doyle GP; D'yachkova Y; Phillips N; Onysko J; Shumak R; Smith NE; Wadden N
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):809-15. PubMed ID: 16424236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors Associated with Adherence to Mammography Screening Among Insured Women Differ by Income Levels.
Gathirua-Mwangi W; Cohee A; Tarver WL; Marley A; Biederman E; Stump T; Monahan P; Rawl S; Skinner CS; Champion VL
Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(5):462-469. PubMed ID: 30098875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.
Zahl PH; Maehlen J; Welch HG
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 168(21):2311-6. PubMed ID: 19029493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences.
Michaelson J; Satija S; Moore R; Weber G; Halpern E; Garland A; Puri D; Kopans DB
Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11815958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program.
Lagerlund M; Hedin A; Sparén P; Thurfjell E; Lambe M
Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 11006068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Low-cost mass screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 1727358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Relationship of age to mammography compliance.
Champion V
Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):329-35. PubMed ID: 8004604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening.
Buseman S; Mouchawar J; Calonge N; Byers T
Cancer; 2003 Jan; 97(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 12518359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Use of Screening Mammography to Detect Occult Malignancy in Autologous Breast Reconstructions: A 15-year Experience.
Noroozian M; Carlson LW; Savage JL; Jeffries DO; Joe AI; Neal CH; Patterson SK; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
Radiology; 2018 Oct; 289(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 30129903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of low-cost mammography screening on nearby mammography practices.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 3380983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improving the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram.
Olivotto IA; Borugian MJ; Kan L; Harris SR; Rousseau EJ; Thorne SE; Vestrup JA; Wright CJ; Coldman AJ; Hislop TG
Can J Public Health; 2001; 92(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 11702491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer.
Wu H; Zhu K; Jatoi I; Shah M; Shriver CD; Potter J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Mar; 101(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16821080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The impact of mammography in 1096 consecutive patients with breast cancer, 1979-1993: equal value for patients younger and older than age 50 years.
Cody HS
Cancer; 1995 Nov; 76(9):1579-84. PubMed ID: 8635061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
