These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8186041)

  • 21. Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104279. PubMed ID: 36070825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Two-stage Impression Technique for Making Edentulous Impressions of Maxillary Displaceable Fibrous Tissues.
    Antonelli JR; Hack SL; Georgescu M; Lopez KL
    Todays FDA; 2016; 28(2):68-9, 71. PubMed ID: 27220181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of procedural variations during the laboratory phase of complete denture fabrication on patient satisfaction and denture quality.
    Omar R; Al-Tarakemah Y; Akbar J; Al-Awadhi S; Behbehani Y; Lamontagne P
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):852-60. PubMed ID: 23911602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement of the accuracy of dental working casts using a coordinate measuring machine.
    Potran M; Štrbac B; Puškar T; Hadžistević M; Hodolič J; Trifković B
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Oct; 73(10):895-903. PubMed ID: 29327892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Possible physiologic results of preliminary impressions, achieved with an impression tray. Registration of an intermaxillary relation aided by the auto-articulator, in the treatment of the total bimaxillary edentulousness].
    Lande A
    Inf Dent; 1980 Oct; 62(34):2975-99. PubMed ID: 7007241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complete mucostatic impression: a new attempt.
    Bindhoo YA; Thirumurthy VR; Kurien A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 22356157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of standardized casts and prefabricated trays in construction of complete dentures.
    Schwartz R
    Gen Dent; 1981; 29(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 7035288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Effect of Edentulous Maxillary Impression Tray Designs When Flabby Tissue Is Present: An In Vitro Study.
    Shin JO; Huh YH; Cho LR; Park CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 27611750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of a digital impression procedure using photogrammetry for complete denture fabrication.
    Matsuda T; Goto T; Kurahashi K; Kashiwabara T; Ichikawa T
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 27644177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pressure control for complete denture impressions.
    Weng BX; Khlevnoy V
    Oral Health; 1995 Nov; 85(11):21-3, 24, 27. PubMed ID: 8779757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Management of excessive movable tissue: a modified impression technique.
    Shum MH; Pow EH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 24461949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A one-appointment impression and centric relation record technique for compromised complete denture patients.
    Ansari IH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 9297651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.