These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8186764)
1. Development of physical fitness standards for Canadian Armed Forces older personnel. Stevenson JM; Deakin JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Smith JT; Thomson JM Can J Appl Physiol; 1994 Mar; 19(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 8186764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of physical fitness standards for Canadian Armed Forces younger personnel. Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; Andrew GM; Smith JT; French SL; Thomson JM; Deakin JM Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Sep; 17(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 1325261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of a preselection physical fitness training program for Canadian Special Operations Regiment applicants. Carlson MJ; Jaenen SP J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S2-14. PubMed ID: 22643138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The FORCE Fitness Profile--Adding a Measure of Health-Related Fitness to the Canadian Armed Forces Operational Fitness Evaluation. Gagnon P; Spivock M; Reilly T; Mattie P; Stockbrugger B J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S192-8. PubMed ID: 26506187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Explaining Performance on Military Tasks in the Canadian Armed Forces: The Importance of Morphological and Physical Fitness Characteristics. Tingelstad HC; Theoret D; Spicovck M; Haman F Mil Med; 2016 Nov; 181(11):e1623-e1629. PubMed ID: 27849498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical Employment Standards for UK Royal Navy Personnel: A Survey of Tasks That Require Muscle Strength and Endurance. Brown PEH; Fallowfield JL Mil Med; 2019 Dec; 184(11-12):882-888. PubMed ID: 31067314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physiological Demands of Basic Fire Management Tasks in Members of the Canadian Armed Forces: A Pilot Study. Chassé É; Théoret D; Poirier MP; Lalonde F Mil Med; 2023 May; 188(5-6):e942-e948. PubMed ID: 34652444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational demand and human rights. Public safety officers and cardiorespiratory fitness. Shephard RJ Sports Med; 1991 Aug; 12(2):94-109. PubMed ID: 1947536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers. Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of anthropometrics on physical employment standard performance. Reilly T; Spivock M; Prayal-Brown A; Stockbrugger B; Blacklock R Occup Med (Lond); 2016 Oct; 66(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 27261454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association Between Musculoskeletal Injuries and the Canadian Armed Forces Physical Employment Standard Proxy in Canadian Military Recruits. Chassé E; Laroche MA; Dufour CA; Guimond R; Lalonde F Mil Med; 2020 Aug; 185(7-8):e1140-e1146. PubMed ID: 32383455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of youth aerobic-capacity standards using receiver operating characteristic curves. Welk GJ; Laurson KR; Eisenmann JC; Cureton KJ Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4 Suppl 2):S111-6. PubMed ID: 21961610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construction, validation, and derivation of performance standards for a fitness test for correctional officer applicants. Jamnik VK; Thomas SG; Burr JF; Gledhill N Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2010 Feb; 35(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 20130667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standard Establishment Through Scenarios (SETS): A new technique for occupational fitness standards. Blacklock RE; Reilly TJ; Spivock M; Newton PS; Olinek SM Work; 2015; 52(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 26409372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification and characterization of the critical physically demanding tasks encountered by correctional officers. Jamnik VK; Thomas SG; Shaw JA; Gledhill N Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2010 Feb; 35(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 20130666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap. Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PWC 75%/kg, a fitness index not linked to resting heart rate: testing procedure and reference values. Batcho CS; Thonnard JL; Nielens H Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jul; 93(7):1196-200. PubMed ID: 22521927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and application of a questionnaire to self-rate physical work demands for ground combat soldiers. Larsson J; Dencker M; Olsson MC; Bremander A Appl Ergon; 2020 Feb; 83():103002. PubMed ID: 31747636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers. Foulis SA; Sharp MA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Gebhardt DL; Baker TA; Canino MC; Zambraski EJ J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S74-S78. PubMed ID: 28823473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]