BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8186764)

  • 1. Development of physical fitness standards for Canadian Armed Forces older personnel.
    Stevenson JM; Deakin JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Smith JT; Thomson JM
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1994 Mar; 19(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 8186764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of physical fitness standards for Canadian Armed Forces younger personnel.
    Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; Andrew GM; Smith JT; French SL; Thomson JM; Deakin JM
    Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Sep; 17(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 1325261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of a preselection physical fitness training program for Canadian Special Operations Regiment applicants.
    Carlson MJ; Jaenen SP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S2-14. PubMed ID: 22643138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The FORCE Fitness Profile--Adding a Measure of Health-Related Fitness to the Canadian Armed Forces Operational Fitness Evaluation.
    Gagnon P; Spivock M; Reilly T; Mattie P; Stockbrugger B
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S192-8. PubMed ID: 26506187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explaining Performance on Military Tasks in the Canadian Armed Forces: The Importance of Morphological and Physical Fitness Characteristics.
    Tingelstad HC; Theoret D; Spicovck M; Haman F
    Mil Med; 2016 Nov; 181(11):e1623-e1629. PubMed ID: 27849498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical Employment Standards for UK Royal Navy Personnel: A Survey of Tasks That Require Muscle Strength and Endurance.
    Brown PEH; Fallowfield JL
    Mil Med; 2019 Dec; 184(11-12):882-888. PubMed ID: 31067314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological Demands of Basic Fire Management Tasks in Members of the Canadian Armed Forces: A Pilot Study.
    Chassé É; Théoret D; Poirier MP; Lalonde F
    Mil Med; 2023 May; 188(5-6):e942-e948. PubMed ID: 34652444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occupational demand and human rights. Public safety officers and cardiorespiratory fitness.
    Shephard RJ
    Sports Med; 1991 Aug; 12(2):94-109. PubMed ID: 1947536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
    Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of anthropometrics on physical employment standard performance.
    Reilly T; Spivock M; Prayal-Brown A; Stockbrugger B; Blacklock R
    Occup Med (Lond); 2016 Oct; 66(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 27261454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
    Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association Between Musculoskeletal Injuries and the Canadian Armed Forces Physical Employment Standard Proxy in Canadian Military Recruits.
    Chassé E; Laroche MA; Dufour CA; Guimond R; Lalonde F
    Mil Med; 2020 Aug; 185(7-8):e1140-e1146. PubMed ID: 32383455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of youth aerobic-capacity standards using receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Welk GJ; Laurson KR; Eisenmann JC; Cureton KJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4 Suppl 2):S111-6. PubMed ID: 21961610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Construction, validation, and derivation of performance standards for a fitness test for correctional officer applicants.
    Jamnik VK; Thomas SG; Burr JF; Gledhill N
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2010 Feb; 35(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 20130667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard Establishment Through Scenarios (SETS): A new technique for occupational fitness standards.
    Blacklock RE; Reilly TJ; Spivock M; Newton PS; Olinek SM
    Work; 2015; 52(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 26409372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification and characterization of the critical physically demanding tasks encountered by correctional officers.
    Jamnik VK; Thomas SG; Shaw JA; Gledhill N
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2010 Feb; 35(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 20130666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
    Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PWC 75%/kg, a fitness index not linked to resting heart rate: testing procedure and reference values.
    Batcho CS; Thonnard JL; Nielens H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jul; 93(7):1196-200. PubMed ID: 22521927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and application of a questionnaire to self-rate physical work demands for ground combat soldiers.
    Larsson J; Dencker M; Olsson MC; Bremander A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Feb; 83():103002. PubMed ID: 31747636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers.
    Foulis SA; Sharp MA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Gebhardt DL; Baker TA; Canino MC; Zambraski EJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S74-S78. PubMed ID: 28823473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.