164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8186806)
1. Electrical safety reconsidered--the new AAMI electrical safety standard.
Staewen WS
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1994; 28(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 8186806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1: A new approach to device standards.
Schmidt M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(3):246-7. PubMed ID: 16796337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Top 10 things OR nurses should know about AAMI standards.
AAMI
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2005; 39(4):326-7. PubMed ID: 16111414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US contributions to international standards for medical electrical equipment.
Ibbott GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Mar; 9(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 22386172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical safety Q&A. A reference guide for the clinical engineer.
Health Devices; 2005 Feb; 34(2):57-75. PubMed ID: 15839515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meet the challenge of the implementation of the EMC standard for medical electrical equipment].
Pan Y; Lin W; Liu J
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 35(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 21706802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global harmonization--a catalyst for safety.
Jacques T
Occup Health Saf; 2010 May; 79(5):48-9. PubMed ID: 20491303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Safe Medical Devices Act: what you need to know now to comply with the new law.
Alder HC
Health Facil Manage; 1991 Nov; 4(11):14, 16, 18 passim. PubMed ID: 10114508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ask George.
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2014; 48(6):413. PubMed ID: 25408976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assurance cases: their use today and the challenges ahead.
Ray A
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; 46(3):195, 198-200. PubMed ID: 22591529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical device epidemiology and surveillance: patient safety is the bottom line.
Brown SL; Bright RA; Tavris DR
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2004 Sep; 1(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16293003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ensuring safe and effective medical devices.
Feigal DW; Gardner SN; McClellan M
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(3):191-2. PubMed ID: 12529457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing risks and recalls: safety assurance cases for medical devices.
Eagles S; Wu F
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2014; 48(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 24548031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Postmarket surveillance for medical devices: America's new strategy.
Normand SL; Hatfield L; Drozda J; Resnic FS
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6848. PubMed ID: 23060660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices: Medical Devices.
Berry MD;
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2015 Dec; ():1-64. PubMed ID: 27116798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubt and proof: the need to verify the cleaning process.
Azizi J; Basile RJ
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():49-54. PubMed ID: 22559777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. FDA's Quality System Inspection Technique in Ireland.
Higgins S
Med Device Technol; 2001; 12(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 11317865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Putting patient safety first: the sterile processing department and healthcare technology management.
Chobin N; Swanson K
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():27-31. PubMed ID: 22559773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An in-house perspective: evaluate costs and benefits of FDA regulation.
Bauld TJ
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 9619250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Birth of a Standard: Achieving Consensus on Safe and Effective Healthcare Technology.
Vockley M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):368-379. PubMed ID: 28934572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
