106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8187726)
1. Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of multiple or repeated genotoxicity assays.
Edler L
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8187726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical methods for short-term tests in genetic toxicology: the first fifteen years.
Edler L
Mutat Res; 1992 Jul; 277(1):11-33. PubMed ID: 1376440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Lauwers A; Griffioen G; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The resolving power of in vitro genotoxicity assays for cigarette smoke particulate matter.
Scott K; Saul J; Crooks I; Camacho OM; Dillon D; Meredith C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1312-9. PubMed ID: 23499632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical methods for the Ames Salmonella assay: a review.
Kim BS; Margolin BH
Mutat Res; 1999 Jan; 436(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 9878704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency.
White PA; Rasmussen JB
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 27(4):270-305. PubMed ID: 8665872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical analysis of data in mutagenicity assays: rodent micronucleus assay.
Hayashi M; Hashimoto S; Sakamoto Y; Hamada C; Sofuni T; Yoshimura I
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8187724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biostatistical analysis of the micronucleus mutagenicity assay based on the assumption of a mixing distribution.
Hothorn L
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):121-5. PubMed ID: 8187700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining different assays and chemical analysis to characterize the genotoxicity of waters impacted by textile discharges.
Vacchi FI; Vendemiatti JA; Brosselin V; Ferreira da Silva B; B Zanoni MV; DeMeo M; Bony S; Devaux A; Umbuzeiro GA
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Aug; 57(7):559-71. PubMed ID: 27412112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From the Cover: An Investigation of the Genotoxicity and Interference of Gold Nanoparticles in Commonly Used In Vitro Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity Assays.
George JM; Magogotya M; Vetten MA; Buys AV; Gulumian M
Toxicol Sci; 2017 Mar; 156(1):149-166. PubMed ID: 28108664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In silico assessment of chemical mutagenesis in comparison with results of Salmonella microsome assay on 909 chemicals.
Hayashi M; Kamata E; Hirose A; Takahashi M; Morita T; Ema M
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 16257575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical characterization of negative control data in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test.
Hamada C; Wada T; Sakamoto Y
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):115-9. PubMed ID: 8187699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing.
Rothfuss A; Honma M; Czich A; Aardema MJ; Burlinson B; Galloway S; Hamada S; Kirkland D; Heflich RH; Howe J; Nakajima M; O'Donovan M; Plappert-Helbig U; Priestley C; Recio L; Schuler M; Uno Y; Martus HJ
Mutat Res; 2011 Aug; 723(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 21182982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a highthroughput yeast-based assay for detection of metabolically activated genotoxins.
Liu X; Kramer JA; Swaffield JC; Hu Y; Chai G; Wilson AG
Mutat Res; 2008 May; 653(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 18485802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of the genotoxicity of triallate.
Healy CE; Kier LD; Broeckaert F; Martens MA
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(3):233-51. PubMed ID: 12851156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development of RAD51C, Cystatin A, p53 and Nrf2 luciferase-reporter assays in metabolically competent HepG2 cells for the assessment of mechanism-based genotoxicity and of oxidative stress in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2010 Feb; 696(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 20006733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biostatistical assessment of mutagenicity studies by including the positive control.
Hauschke D; Slacik-Erben R; Hensen S; Kaufmann R
Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):82-7; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.
Kirkland D; Kasper P; Martus HJ; Müller L; van Benthem J; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 795():7-30. PubMed ID: 26774663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the mutagenic and genotoxic effects of the ALC67 thiazolidine compound in Salmonella strains and human lymphocytes in vitro.
Charehsaz M; Onen-Bayram FE; Sipahi H; Buran K; Giri AK; Aydin A
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2016 Oct; 35(10):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26666987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutagens in surface waters: a review.
Ohe T; Watanabe T; Wakabayashi K
Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):109-49. PubMed ID: 15572284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
