81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8187727)
1. Nonparametric regression analysis of data from the Ames mutagenicity assay.
Cologne JB; Breslow NE
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):61-70. PubMed ID: 8187727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical methods for the Ames Salmonella assay: a review.
Kim BS; Margolin BH
Mutat Res; 1999 Jan; 436(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 9878704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of test for overdispersion in Poisson regression.
Xiang L; Lee AH
Biom J; 2005 Apr; 47(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 16389913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Some comments on potency measures in mutagenicity research.
Margolin BH; Kim BS; Smith MG; Fetterman BA; Piegorsch WW; Zeiger E
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):91-4. PubMed ID: 8187732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical analysis of data in mutagenicity assays: rodent micronucleus assay.
Hayashi M; Hashimoto S; Sakamoto Y; Hamada C; Sofuni T; Yoshimura I
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8187724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mixed Poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates.
Wang P; Puterman ML; Cockburn I; Le N
Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):381-400. PubMed ID: 10766499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities.
Valencia A; Prous J; Mora O; Sadrieh N; Valerio LG
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 273(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 24090816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical characterization of negative control data in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test.
Hamada C; Wada T; Sakamoto Y
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):115-9. PubMed ID: 8187699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potent mutagenicity in the Ames test of 2-cyano-4-nitroaniline and 2,6-dicyano-4-nitroaniline, components of disperse dyes.
Josephy PD; Zahid M; Dhanoa J; de Souza GB; Groom H; Lambie M
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 57(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 26394367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity.
Kamber M; Flückiger-Isler S; Engelhardt G; Jaeckh R; Zeiger E
Mutagenesis; 2009 Jul; 24(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 19447896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Salmonella (Ames) test for mutagenicity.
Zeiger E; Mortelmans K
Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001 May; Chapter 3():Unit3.1. PubMed ID: 20941699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The resolving power of in vitro genotoxicity assays for cigarette smoke particulate matter.
Scott K; Saul J; Crooks I; Camacho OM; Dillon D; Meredith C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1312-9. PubMed ID: 23499632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the performance of the Ames II assay: a collaborative study with 19 coded compounds.
Flückiger-Isler S; Baumeister M; Braun K; Gervais V; Hasler-Nguyen N; Reimann R; Van Gompel J; Wunderlich HG; Engelhardt G
Mutat Res; 2004 Mar; 558(1-2):181-97. PubMed ID: 15036131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: Vehicle and positive control results from the standard Ames assay, the 6- and 24-well miniaturized plate incorporation assays and the Ames II™ assay.
Pant K; Bruce S; Sly J; Klug Laforce M; Springer S; Cecil M; Andrus E; Dakoulas E; Wagner VO; Hewitt NJ; Kulkarni R
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Jul; 57(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 27198925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of multiple or repeated genotoxicity assays.
Edler L
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8187726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The evaluation of the mutagenic activity of public drinking water by the Ames test].
Albaladejo Vicente R; Villanueva Orbaiz R; Ortega Molina P; Astasio Arbiza P; Gil Miguel A; Granados Arroyo B; Calle Puron ME; Domínguez Rojas V
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 1995; 69(5):393-408. PubMed ID: 8564859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical analysis of in vitro data for risk assessment - exemplified for a case of Ames test data.
Roller M; Aufderheide M
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18396021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative predictivity of the transformation in vitro assay compared with the Ames test.
Parodi S; Taningher M; Russo P; Pala M; Vecchio D; Fassina G; Santi L
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1983; 12(4-6):483-510. PubMed ID: 6668607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization of the Escherichia coli pol A test: an adjunct to the Ames assay.
Herrig BW; Jones DH
Vet Hum Toxicol; 1980 Oct; 22(5):326-7. PubMed ID: 7006194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutagenicity--relevance of short-term tests.
Pool BL
Oncology; 1980; 37(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 7443159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
