These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 818813)

  • 21. ABO and Rhesus (D) blood group distribution among blood donors in rural south western Uganda: a retrospective study.
    Apecu RO; Mulogo EM; Bagenda F; Byamungu A
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Dec; 9(1):513. PubMed ID: 28003029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a new automated instrument for pretransfusion testing.
    Morelati F; Revelli N; Maffei LM; Poretti M; Santoro C; Parravicini A; Rebulla P; Cole R; Sirchia G
    Transfusion; 1998 Oct; 38(10):959-65. PubMed ID: 9767747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blood units for patients with irregular blood group antibodies: frequency and supply.
    Frick T; Schenker T; Frey-Wettstein M
    Vox Sang; 1986; 50(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 2425487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Groupamatic types 360 C-3, 360 S and MG 50 at work for automatisation of a national blood-transfusion-service. A comparative study.
    Gathof GE; Gathof B; Schulze S; Gathof AG
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1978 Mar; 21(2):705-12. PubMed ID: 97764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experience in the field on integration of the Groupamatic 360 C in a blood center beyond region lines.
    Furst G; Kasulke D; Ungar W
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1978 Mar; 21(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 97762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Groupamatic MG 50 in operation for a large university blood bank: no more tests by hand.
    Backer U; Gathof GE; Gathof AG
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1978 Mar; 21(2):721-5. PubMed ID: 97765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for Routine Use in Transfusion Laboratory.
    Chang C; Brown M; Davies L; Pointon L; Brown R; Barker D
    Transfus Med; 2014 Feb; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24188135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated blood grouping by gel technology.
    Parker PI; Scott Y; McArdle B; Wallis JP
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 8555780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the gel system for ABO grouping and D typing.
    Langston MM; Procter JL; Cipolone KM; Stroncek DF
    Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 10204594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated microplate ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Mintz PD; Anderson G; Barrasso C; Sorenson E
    Transfusion; 1994 Jan; 34(1):88. PubMed ID: 8273143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Automatic reading of ABO and Rh groups on microplates using FMC medium and an IBG Systems reader].
    Mauri J; Maymo RM; Pérez MA; Yusta V; Mas J; Puig L
    Sangre (Barc); 1991 Jun; 36(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 1948546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Erythrocyte-magnetized technology: an original and innovative method for blood group serology.
    Bouix O; Ferrera V; Delamaire M; Redersdorff JC; Roubinet F
    Transfusion; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1878-85. PubMed ID: 18522706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated blood group serology.
    Tovey GH
    J Clin Pathol Suppl Coll Pathol; 1969; 3():34-8. PubMed ID: 4989993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey.
    Walker RH; Cooper ES; Hoeltge GA; de Jongh D; Kuban DJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Mar; 109(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 3919685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate for ABO and Rh typing and alloantibody screening.
    Anderson DR; Wiseman J; MacLeod J; Burton E; Zayed E
    Transfusion; 2000 Jun; 40(6):669-72. PubMed ID: 10864986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The 1987 Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists.
    Cooper ES; Ryden SE; Hill JR; Harrison CR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Sep; 113(9):969-74. PubMed ID: 2505734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maternofetal transfusion during delivery and sensitization of the newborn against the rhesus D-antigen.
    Carapella-de Luca E; Casadei AM; Pascone R; Tardi C; Pacioni C
    Vox Sang; 1978; 34(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 414455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A; Cheves T; Maroto S; Coutts M; Sweeney J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated blood typing of patients.
    Taswell HF; Nicholson LL; Cochran ML
    Transfusion; 1974; 14(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 12731584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High rhesus (Rh(D)) negative frequency and ethnic-group based ABO blood group distribution in Ethiopia.
    Golassa L; Tsegaye A; Erko B; Mamo H
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):330. PubMed ID: 28747227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.