These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8188540)

  • 1. Consistency of sperm morphology classification methods.
    Davis RO; Gravance CG
    J Androl; 1994; 15(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 8188540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of spermatozoa by planar morphometry.
    Harr R
    Clin Lab Sci; 1997; 10(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 10169618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of human sperm morphology by strict criteria: comparison of wet preparation versus stained with the modified Diff-Quik method.
    Oral E; Yetis O; Elibol F; Senol H; Irez T; Aksu FM
    Arch Androl; 2002; 48(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12137592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do not predict the absence or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations.
    Celik-Ozenci C; Jakab A; Kovacs T; Catalanotti J; Demir R; Bray-Ward P; Ward D; Huszar G
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2052-9. PubMed ID: 15205404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Headless spermatozoa in semen specimens from fertile and subfertile men.
    Panidis D; Rousso D; Kourtis A; Gianoulis C; Papathanasiou K; Kalachanis J
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Nov; 46(11):947-50. PubMed ID: 11762149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sperm parameters in men with suspected infertility. Sperm characteristics, strict criteria sperm morphology analysis and hypoosmotic swelling test.
    Andrade-Rocha FT
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jun; 46(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 11441683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser.
    Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility.
    Nallella KP; Sharma RK; Aziz N; Agarwal A
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 16500330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sperm morphology classification: a rational method for schemes adopted by the world health organization.
    Rothmann SA; Bort AM; Quigley J; Pillow R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():27-37. PubMed ID: 22992901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa.
    García-Herreros M; Aparicio IM; Barón FJ; García-Marín LJ; Gil MC
    Int J Androl; 2006 Oct; 29(5):553-63. PubMed ID: 16968497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
    Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Garlak D; Agarwal A
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Round-headed spermatozoa in semen specimens from fertile and subfertile men.
    Kalahanis J; Rousso D; Kourtis A; Mavromatidis G; Makedos G; Panidis D
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Jun; 47(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 12092019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative study of sperm morphology evaluation criteria by the fifth and fourth editions of WHO Laboratory Manual].
    Zhang XZ; Yao KS; Xiong CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Nov; 17(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 22141268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in the canine ejaculate: do they reflect different subpopulations in sperm chromatin integrity?
    Núñez-Martinez I; Moran JM; Peña FJ
    Zygote; 2007 Aug; 15(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 17637107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of strict (Tygerberg) criteria for evaluation of sperm morphology.
    Menkveld R; Kruger TF
    Int J Androl; 1995 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():36-42. PubMed ID: 8719857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of sperm-head morphometric subpopulations in iberian red deer epididymal sperm samples.
    Esteso MC; Fernández-Santos MR; Soler AJ; Montoro V; Martínez-Pastor F; Garde JJ
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Apr; 44(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 18992078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impact of spermatozoid head anomalies as predictor factor of non-determined infertility].
    Ambe AK; Mondragón EC; González SE
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Mar; 76(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 18798409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.
    Bosworth B; Burtless G; Steuerle E
    Soc Secur Bull; 2000; 63(4):74-98. PubMed ID: 11641991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Papanicolaou and Kruger assessment of sperm morphology: thresholds and agreement.
    Vazquez-Levin MH; Goldberg SI; Friedmann P; Des Jarlais DC; Nagler HM
    Int J Androl; 1998 Dec; 21(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9972490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the various techniques of identifying human spermatozoa morphology.
    Ragni G; Marzioli S; Levenberg A; Guercilena S
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(6):437-40. PubMed ID: 6085603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.