These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8188543)

  • 21. Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Braun A; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B; Drexl M
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():235-243. PubMed ID: 28323018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in chickens.
    Sun W; Chen L; Salvi RJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 12097720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear oscillations.
    Powers NL; Salvi RJ; Wang J; Spongr V; Qiu CX
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6532):585-7. PubMed ID: 7791874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Degeneration of sensory outer hair cells following pharmacological blockade of cochlear KCNQ channels in the adult guinea pig.
    Nouvian R; Ruel J; Wang J; Guitton MJ; Pujol R; Puel JL
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 17(12):2553-62. PubMed ID: 12823462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of salicylate and short-term sound exposure on extracochlear electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Makishima K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Oct; 121(7):781-6. PubMed ID: 11718239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Otoacoustic emissions--a step closer to understanding cochlear function].
    Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D; Dankuc D
    Med Pregl; 2001; 54(11-12):539-42. PubMed ID: 11921687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from the apical turns of the gerbil cochlea.
    Nakajima HH; Olson ES; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):786-94. PubMed ID: 7930080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative measure of multicomponents of otoacoustic emissions.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Parthasarathi AA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Mar; 96(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 10720673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions and their distortion products in guinea pigs].
    Guo M; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 16(1):63-6, 70. PubMed ID: 12553279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning.
    Canlon B; Fransson A
    Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 84(1-2):112-24. PubMed ID: 7642444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3559-71. PubMed ID: 15658707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transmission of oto-acoustic emissions within the cochlea.
    Sichel JY; Freeman S; Perez R; Sohmer H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2006; 17(3):143-57. PubMed ID: 17598306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function.
    Krause E; Mayerhofer A; Gürkov R; Drexl M; Braun T; Olzowy B; Boetzel K
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23921920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlea partition. Effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2-f1 and 2f1-f2.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):57-68. PubMed ID: 9387985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.