These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8189186)

  • 1. Transfer of value from S+ to S- in a simultaneous discrimination.
    Zentall TR; Sherburne LM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Apr; 20(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 8189186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Transitive inference" in multiple conditional discriminations.
    Higa JJ; Staddon JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):265-91. PubMed ID: 8454956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous discrimination learning in pigeons: value of S- affects the relative value of its associated S+.
    Clement TS; Weaver JE; Sherburne LM; Zentall TR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 Nov; 51(4):363-78. PubMed ID: 9854439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Six-term transitive inference with pigeons: successive-pair training followed by mixed-pair training.
    Daniels CW; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jan; 101(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 24318977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of value from S+ to S- in simultaneous discriminations in humans.
    Lonon AM; Zentall TR
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 10696277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):467-95. PubMed ID: 12507015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes.
    Urcuioli PJ; Lionello-DeNolf K; Michalek S; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 16903494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus.
    Pearce JM; Adam J; Wilson PN; Darby RJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pigeons' discrimination of Michotte's launching effect.
    Young ME; Beckmann JS; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 17002229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event pavlovian conditioning.
    Zentall TR; Sherburne LM; Roper KL; Kraemer PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Jan; 22(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 8568497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer across delayed discriminations: evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory.
    Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Apr; 18(2):154-73. PubMed ID: 1583445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination of relative numerosity and stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks.
    Honig WK; Matheson WR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Oct; 21(4):348-62. PubMed ID: 7595241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding behavior under nonverbal transitive-inference procedures: Stimulus-control-topography analyses.
    Galizio A; Doughty AH; Williams DC; Saunders KJ
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():202-215. PubMed ID: 28512037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach to the formation of equivalence classes in pigeons.
    Jitsumori M; Siemann M; Lehr M; Delius JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12507011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transitive inference in pigeons may result from differential tendencies to reject the test stimuli acquired during training.
    Zentall TR; Peng D; Miles L
    Anim Cogn; 2019 Sep; 22(5):619-624. PubMed ID: 30927140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.
    Dopson JC; Williams NA; Esber GR; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 21048225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.
    Wright AA; Delius JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
    Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intermodal transfer from a visual to an auditory discrimination using an errorless learning procedure.
    Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 19429224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.