These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8189189)

  • 1. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A problem in measuring the Stroop facilitation and interference effects: implications for measuring performance change in general.
    Chen JY
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):1059-70. PubMed ID: 8961342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.
    Jacoby LL; Lindsay DS; Hessels S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):638-44. PubMed ID: 14620358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
    Fuentes LJ; Ortells JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Dec; 84(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 8128904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing Stroop performance in schizophrenia.
    Barch DM; Carter CS; Cohen JD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 15291726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.
    Glaser WR; Glaser MO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):13-42. PubMed ID: 2522504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    Glaser MO; Glaser WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):875-94. PubMed ID: 6218237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.
    Spieler DH; Balota DA; Faust ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 8934854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task.
    Henik A; Ro T; Merrill D; Rafal R; Safadi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 10069032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis.
    Yee PL; Hunt E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 1834786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior cingulate cortex and the Stroop task: neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity.
    Swick D; Jovanovic J
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1240-53. PubMed ID: 11931927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Components of Stroop-like interference in word reading.
    La Heij W; Happel B; Mulder M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 2343768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions.
    Salo R; Henik A; Robertson LC
    Neuropsychology; 2001 Oct; 15(4):462-71. PubMed ID: 11761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.