BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8189193)

  • 21. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.
    Wühr P; Biebl R; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 18444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sources of interference from irrelevant information: a developmental study.
    Ridderinkhof KR; van der Molen MW; Band GP; Bashore TR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):315-41. PubMed ID: 9178963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Liu X; Park Y; Gu X; Fan J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1710-20. PubMed ID: 20675812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.
    Wühr P
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial repetition blindness is modulated by selective attention to color or shape.
    Kanwisher N; Driver J; Machado L
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Dec; 29(3):303-37. PubMed ID: 8556848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Simon effect for threat-related stimulus content.
    Schrooten MG; Smulders FT
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 17109814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Covert processing of visual form in the absence of area LO.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1488-95. PubMed ID: 15246286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis.
    Iani C; Ricci F; Baroni G; Rubichi S
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):856-63. PubMed ID: 19648030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.