BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8190240)

  • 1. When does "no" really mean "yes"? A case study in unilateral visual neglect.
    Mijović-Prelec D; Shin LM; Chabris CF; Kosslyn SM
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Feb; 32(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 8190240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemianopia, hemianesthesia, and spatial neglect: a study with evoked potentials.
    Vallar G; Sandroni P; Rusconi ML; Barbieri S
    Neurology; 1991 Dec; 41(12):1918-22. PubMed ID: 1745349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossed avoiding reaction: a disturbance of the manual spatial function.
    Nagumo T; Yamadori A; Soma Y; Kayamori R; Ito M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1993 May; 56(5):552-5. PubMed ID: 8505650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients.
    Làdavas E; Petronio A; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1990 Sep; 26(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 2249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audio-Visual Stimulation Improves Visual Search Abilities in Hemianopia due to Childhood Acquired Brain Lesions.
    Tinelli F; Purpura G; Cioni G
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(1-2):153-71. PubMed ID: 26152056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unilateral neglect can be affected by stimuli in the neglected field.
    Berti A; Maravita A; Frassinetti F; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1995 Jun; 31(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 7555010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retinotopic modulation of space misrepresentation in unilateral neglect: evidence from quadrantanopia.
    Doricchi F; Guariglia P; Figliozzi F; Magnotti L; Gabriele G
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2003 Jan; 74(1):116-9. PubMed ID: 12486281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional load and visual neglect.
    Robertson I; Frasca R
    Int J Neurosci; 1992 Jan; 62(1-2):45-56. PubMed ID: 1342013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Good recovery in visual scanning in a patient with persistent anosognosia.
    Zoccolotti P; Guariglia C; Pizzamiglio L; Judica A; Razzano C; Pantano P
    Int J Neurosci; 1992 Mar; 63(1-2):93-104. PubMed ID: 1342029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Convergent and divergent effects of neck proprioceptive and visual motion stimulation on visual space processing in neglect.
    Schindler I; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1149-55. PubMed ID: 15178166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between the position of the egocentric reference and right neglect signs in left-brain-damaged patients.
    Chokron S; Bartolomeo P
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):99-104. PubMed ID: 10857672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Specific impairments in visual processing following lesion side in hemianopic patients.
    Cavézian C; Gaudry I; Perez C; Coubard O; Doucet G; Peyrin C; Marendaz C; Obadia M; Gout O; Chokron S
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19880103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of acute stroke patients for treatment of visual neglect.
    Stone SP; Patel P; Greenwood RJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1993 May; 56(5):463-6. PubMed ID: 8505635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ipsilateral neglect in a patient following a unilateral frontal lesion.
    Kwon SE; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 1991 Dec; 41(12):2001-4. PubMed ID: 1745365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visuo-spatial neglect: qualitative differences and laterality of cerebral lesion.
    Halligan PW; Burn JP; Marshall JC; Wade DT
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1992 Nov; 55(11):1060-8. PubMed ID: 1469403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neglect and hemianopia superimposed.
    Müller-Oehring EM; Kasten E; Poggel DA; Schulte T; Strasburger H; Sabel BA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1154-68. PubMed ID: 14566587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual evoked potential diagnosis of field defects in patients with chiasmatic and retrochiasmatic lesions.
    Onofrj M; Bodis-Wollner I; Mylin L
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1982 Apr; 45(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 7077338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of ocular motor reading strategies to the status of adaptation in patients with hemianopic visual field defects.
    Schoepf D; Zangemeister WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Jun; 682():404-8. PubMed ID: 8323149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gaze-dependent hemianopia without hemispatial neglect.
    Nadeau SE; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 1991 Aug; 41(8):1244-50. PubMed ID: 1866014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.