These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8190244)
1. The non-contribution of attentional biases to visual field asymmetries for temporal discrimination. Nicholls ME Neuropsychologia; 1994 Feb; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 8190244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition. Nicholls ME; Wood AG Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cerebral asymmetries in the level of attention required for word recognition. Nicholls ME; Wood AG; Hayes L Laterality; 2001 Apr; 6(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 15513163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease. Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits. Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orienting of visual attention in dyslexia: evidence for asymmetric hemispheric control of attention. Facoetti A; Turatto M; Lorusso ML; Mascetti GG Exp Brain Res; 2001 May; 138(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 11374082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Right visual-field advantage in the attentional blink: Asymmetry in attentional gating across time and space. Bergerbest D; Shilkrot O; Joseph M; Salti M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1979-1992. PubMed ID: 28643206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal. Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemispheric differences in attentional orienting by social cues. Greene DJ; Zaidel E Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21093465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A failure to produce a left hemisphere advantage through verbal priming. Nicholls ME; Clode D Neuropsychologia; 1996 Sep; 34(9):893-904. PubMed ID: 8822736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility. Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemispheric asymmetries for an inspection time task: a general left hemisphere temporal advantage? Nicholls ME; Atkinson J Neuropsychologia; 1993 Nov; 31(11):1181-90. PubMed ID: 8107979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional deployment in visual half-field tasks: the effect of cue position on word naming latency. Lindell AK; Nicholls ME Brain Cogn; 2003 Nov; 53(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 14607163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual field asymmetries and allocation of attention in visual scenes. Rhodes DL; Robertson LC Brain Cogn; 2002 Oct; 50(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 12372355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias for the left visual field in rapid serial visual presentation: effects of additional salient cues suggest a critical role of attention. Śmigasiewicz K; Asanowicz D; Westphal N; Verleger R J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 27(2):266-79. PubMed ID: 25203275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries. Mondor TA; Bryden MP Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Apr; 44(3):529-55. PubMed ID: 1631321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention in schizophrenia. Maruff P; Hay D; Malone V; Currie J Neuropsychologia; 1995 Oct; 33(10):1205-23. PubMed ID: 8552225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness. Railo H; Tallus J; Hämäläinen H Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli. Lupien S; Lafrance MS; Lecours AR Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]