These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8190600)
1. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception. Predebon J Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy. Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant. Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vertical disparity affects shape and size judgments across surfaces separated in depth. O'Kane LM; Hibbard PB Perception; 2007; 36(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 17624116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: familiar versus unfamiliar size. Predebon J Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 1758767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of familiar size on judgments of relative size and distance. Predebon J Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1211-4. PubMed ID: 492892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances. Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereoscopic matching and the aperture problem. van Dam LC; van Ee R Perception; 2004; 33(7):769-87. PubMed ID: 15460506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new binocular cue for absolute distance: Disparity relative to the most distant structure. Sousa R; Brenner E; Smeets JB Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(18):1786-92. PubMed ID: 20595037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception. Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Seeing stereoscopic depth from disparity between kinetic edges. Poom L Perception; 2002; 31(12):1439-48. PubMed ID: 12916668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New depth to the Müller-Lyer illusion. Glennerster A; Rogers BJ Perception; 1993; 22(6):691-704. PubMed ID: 8255699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation. Bishop PO Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1989 Sep; 237(1289):445-69. PubMed ID: 2573901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Cumming BG; Parker AJ Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information. Kuroki D; Nakamizo S Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of parallax and interpupillary distance on size judgment performances of virtual objects in stereoscopic displays. Woldegiorgis BH; Lin CJ; Liang WZ Ergonomics; 2019 Jan; 62(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 30235062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]