These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8191367)
21. Respecting the autonomy of the biologically driven. Tiemstra JD J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 10904892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ethical dilemma #48. "Who cares for the incompetent patient". Hasegawa TK; Matthews M; Reed M Tex Dent J; 2004 Jul; 121(7):616-9. PubMed ID: 15461251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. When the truth hurts. Sprigler GB Plast Surg Nurs; 1996; 16(1):51-3, 56. PubMed ID: 8710984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomedical experimentation involving elderly subjects: the need to balance limited, benevolent protection with recognition of a long history of autonomous decision-making. Part II. Weisstub DN; Verdun-Jones SN; Walker J Health Law Can; 1998 May; 18(4):105-14. PubMed ID: 10181435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Health care treatment decision-making guidelines for adults with developmental disabilities. ; Bioethics Forum; 1996; 12(3):S/1-8. PubMed ID: 11660310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Depolarizing and complicating the ethics of treatment decision making in brain injury: a disability rights response to Nelson and Frader. Gill CJ J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):277-88; discussion 289-91. PubMed ID: 15830556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Substitute consent to health care: patients' rights vs responsibility to provide care. Barkin M Health Law Can; 1988; 8(4):87-8. PubMed ID: 10312620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The dilemma of "medical futility"--a "wisdom model" for decisionmaking. Reitman JS Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):231-64. PubMed ID: 9029841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The ethics of early stopping rules: who is protecting whom? Cannistra SA J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(9):1542-5. PubMed ID: 15117977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [The patient and the informed consent]. Hjortdahl P; Gulbrandsen P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Mar; 120(8):893. PubMed ID: 10795486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Roles and fictions in clinical and research ethics. Weisstub DN Health Law J; 1996; 4():259-82. PubMed ID: 10569891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Living and dying: a delicate balance. Robitscher J Engage Soc Action; 1973 Oct; 1(10):38-53. PubMed ID: 11661037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Standards of care: good of evil? Owen CP Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 19725197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Children, society, and health care decision making. Caccamo JM Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):32-4. PubMed ID: 11654290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The decision dynamics of clinical research: the context and process of informed consent. Kuczewski MG; Marshall P Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V45-54. PubMed ID: 12226585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does medicine care about patients' rights? Glantz LH Guthrie Bull; 1976; 46(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11662287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Refusal to consent by substitute decision-maker. Edney J Health Law Can; 1988; 8(4):112-3. PubMed ID: 10312619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]