These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8191500)

  • 21. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.
    Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Extent of corneal injury as a biomarker for hazard assessment and the development of alternative models to the Draize rabbit eye test.
    Jester JV
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2006; 25(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 16702053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of low-volume dosing in the eye irritation test.
    Lambert LA; Chambers WA; Green S; Gupta KC; Hill RN; Hurley PM; Lee CC; Lee JK; Liu PT; Lowther DK
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8449463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Ex Vivo Eye Irritation Test as an alternative test method for serious eye damage/eye irritation.
    Spöler F; Kray O; Kray S; Panfil C; Schrage NF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):163-79. PubMed ID: 26256395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A reassessment of the in vitro RBC haemolysis assay with defibrinated sheep blood for the determination of the ocular irritation potential of cosmetic products: comparison with the in vivo Draize rabbit test.
    Alves EN; Presgrave Rde F; Presgrave OA; Sabagh FP; de Freitas JC; Corrado AP
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Jul; 36(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 18662092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: eye irritation.
    McNamee P; Hibatallah J; Costabel-Farkas M; Goebel C; Araki D; Dufour E; Hewitt NJ; Jones P; Kirst A; Le Varlet B; Macfarlane M; Marrec-Fairley M; Rowland J; Schellauf F; Scheel J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 19393279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Introduction of in vitro data into local irritation/corrosion testing strategies by means of SAR considerations: assessment of chemicals.
    Gerner I; Schlede E
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):169-75. PubMed ID: 12052655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. IRAG working group 1. Organotypic models for the assessment/prediction of ocular irritation. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group.
    Chamberlain M; Gad SC; Gautheron P; Prinsen MK
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 9100813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test.
    Lagarto A; Vega R; Vega Y; Guerra I; González R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 16293391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of eye irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis.
    Kulkarni A; Hopfinger AJ; Osborne R; Bruner LH; Thompson ED
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 11158727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extent of initial corneal injury as a basis for alternative eye irritation tests.
    Jester JV; Li L; Molai A; Maurer JK
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 11287171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ocular safety: a silent (in vitro) success story.
    Curren RD; Harbell JW
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():69-74. PubMed ID: 12513653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Draize test and alternative methods for evaluating irritation from chemical substances].
    Moskalewski S; Mystkowska ET; Kiss E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8533034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of HET-CAM test in detecting the ocular irritation.
    Tavaszi J; Budai P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 18399434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of low volume, draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. II. Oil/water emulsions.
    Gettings SD; Lordo RA; Feder PI; Hintze KL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Jan; 36(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 9487363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An approach to the development of in vitro toxicological methods.
    Goldberg AM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 4040067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes.
    Kolle SN; Rey Moreno MC; Mayer W; van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 26256396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of the reconstructed rabbit corneal epithelium model to assess the in-vitro eye irritant test of chemicals.
    Matsuda S; Hisama M; Shibayama H; Itou N; Iwaki M
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 129(9):1113-20. PubMed ID: 19721387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improvement of the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay as an in vitro alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test.
    Verstraelen S; Jacobs A; De Wever B; Vanparys P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1298-311. PubMed ID: 23501624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A critical review of the assessment of eye irritation potential using the Draize rabbit eye test.
    York M; Steiling W
    J Appl Toxicol; 1998; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 9719422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.