159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8191818)
1. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
Chakrabarti S; Guijon FB; Paraskevas M
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
Lo L; Jordan J
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
Partoll LM; Javaheri G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The detection of endocervical gland involvement by high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in smears prepared from endocervical brush specimens.
Van Hoeven KH; Hanau CA; Hudock JA
Cytopathology; 1996 Oct; 7(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 8911754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical changes associated with progestagen-only contraceptives: a team approach.
Darwish A; Labeeb S; Galal M; Rashad H; Hassan S
Contraception; 2004 Feb; 69(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 14759616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pap smears with reactive cellular changes: a prospective study.
Ding DC; Hsu S; Chen SS; Hsu YH
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):938-40. PubMed ID: 17977169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The use of the cervix brush for early diagnosis of cervix uteri cancer: quality of the smear].
Weyler J; Engels H
Arch Belg; 1989; 47(1-4):81-4. PubMed ID: 2610580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
