159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8191818)
21. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Morphologic changes in cervix smears by intrauterine pessary].
Ortner A; Huber A; Pertoll J; Tabarelli M; Mikuz G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 45(4):244-6. PubMed ID: 4007460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.
Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Low grade and ASCUS lesions of the cervix: diagnostic difficulties and reproducibility.
Raab SS
Ann Pathol; 1999; 19(5 Suppl):S87-9. PubMed ID: 10599462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
Selvaggi SM
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions in normal and dysplastic cervical lesions: correlation with DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by flow cytometry.
Singh M; Prasad S; Kalra N; Singh U; Shukla Y
Oncology; 2006; 71(5-6):411-6. PubMed ID: 17785995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology specimens for the immunocytochemical study of p16 expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials.
Yoshida T; Fukuda T; Sano T; Kanuma T; Owada N; Nakajima T
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 15098254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
