These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. PET projects: providers like what they see. Wagner M Mod Healthc; 1992 Nov; 22(48):34-6, 38, 40. PubMed ID: 10122258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost of positron emission tomography in six United States Veterans Affairs hospitals and two academic medical centers. Berger M; Gould MK; Barnett PG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 12876011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities. Zanzonico P; Dauer L; St Germain J Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):554-70. PubMed ID: 18849690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PET offers high-tech tool--but with high price tag. Hinz CA Health Care Strateg Manage; 1991 Dec; 9(12):1, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10115184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of trends and demands for PET imaging: one community hospital's experience. Wong CO; Hill JC J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):21N-24N. PubMed ID: 11776253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A cost analysis of positron emission tomography. Keppler JS; Conti PS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11418393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is hybridic positron emission tomography/computerized tomography the only option? The future of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Grammaticos P; Zerva C; Asteriadis I; Trontzos C; Hatziioannou K Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 17684579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk/cost analysis of equipment in a mixed regulatory/competitive environment. Keefe J Radiol Manage; 1984 Sep; 6(4):18-21. PubMed ID: 10310924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Positron emission tomography; making an informed decision. Webster W Radiol Manage; 1988; 10(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 10295389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beware the Medical-Industrial Complex. Stevens CW; Glatstein E Oncologist; 1996; 1(4):IV-V. PubMed ID: 10388005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal cost of operating a positron emission tomography center in a regulatory environment. Chuck A; Jacobs P; Logus JW; St Hilaire D; Chmielowiec C; McEwan AJ Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(4):442-51. PubMed ID: 16262966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saga of payment systems of ambulatory surgery centers for interventional techniques: an update. Manchikanti L; Singh V; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2012; 15(2):109-30. PubMed ID: 22430649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The current status of positron emission tomography. Digby W; Keppler J Radiol Manage; 2000; 22(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10787760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Positron emission tomography--a technique for the routine practice of ambulatory care?]. Gibis B; Rheinberger P; Sander G; Kirkowa-Reimann M; Schmacke N; Gawlik C Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Apr; 97(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12806822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost analyses of positron emission tomography for clinical use. Evens RG; Siegel BA; Welch MJ; Ter-Pogossian MM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Nov; 141(5):1073-6. PubMed ID: 6605052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hurdles to technology diffusion: what are expectations for PET? McGivney WT J Nucl Med; 1991 Apr; 32(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 2013804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care. Meropol NJ; Schrag D; Smith TJ; Mulvey TM; Langdon RM; Blum D; Ubel PA; Schnipper LE; J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 19581533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]