181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8192846)
1. Free-field binaural unmasking in ferrets.
Hine JE; Martin RL; Moore DR
Behav Neurosci; 1994 Feb; 108(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 8192846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monaural and binaural spectrum level cues in the ferret: acoustics and the neural representation of auditory space.
Carlile S; King AJ
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Feb; 71(2):785-801. PubMed ID: 8176440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference.
Albeck Y; Nebenzahl I; Lewis A
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1389-93. PubMed ID: 1401525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
Kollmeier B; Holube I
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free-field binaural unmasking in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
Dent ML; Larsen ON; Dooling RJ
Behav Neurosci; 1997 Jun; 111(3):590-598. PubMed ID: 9189273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of ear plugging on single-unit azimuth sensitivity in cat primary auditory cortex. I. Evidence for monaural directional cues.
Samson FK; Clarey JC; Barone P; Imig TJ
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Aug; 70(2):492-511. PubMed ID: 8410151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters.
Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1089-104. PubMed ID: 11519577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters.
Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1105-17. PubMed ID: 11519578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of ear plugging on single-unit azimuth sensitivity in cat primary auditory cortex. II. Azimuth tuning dependent upon binaural stimulation.
Samson FK; Barone P; Clarey JC; Imig TJ
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jun; 71(6):2194-216. PubMed ID: 7931511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile.
Santurette S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2968-86. PubMed ID: 22501074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
Marks LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot.
Hicks ML; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
Johnson TA; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Hoover BM; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
