These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8193285)
1. Breast cancer heterogeneity assessed by flow cytometry. Savarese A; Vecchione A In Vivo; 1993; 7(6B):631-4. PubMed ID: 8193285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study. Ottesen GL APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Heterogeneity of human breast cancer cells and their biological behavior]. Tian HM; Fu J; Cao DY; Shi XY; Li JX; Shao CJ; Ma DM; Huang H; Li M; Qu P; Liu ZY; Zhang W Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2003 Nov; 25(6):535-7. PubMed ID: 14690555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA flow cytometric measurements in breast cancer: a review of the instrumentation principles and clinical significance. Berho M; Viciana AL; Poppiti RJ; Ruiz P J Fla Med Assoc; 1997 Feb; 84(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 9066236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flow cytometry of breast cancer. Feichter GE Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 1931895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: review of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer]. Moureau-Zabotto L; Bouchet C; Cesari D; Uzan S; Lefranc JP; Antoine M; Genestie C; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Bernaudin JF; Touboul E; Fleury-Feith J Cancer Radiother; 2005 Dec; 9(8):575-86. PubMed ID: 16243560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward the use of monoclonal antibodies in the analysis of tumor progression and cellular heterogeneity of human breast cancer. Nilsson K Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1984; 519():15-8. PubMed ID: 6595923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases. Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Her2/neu analysis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and multiparameter DNA flow cytometry. Leers MP; Hoop JG; Nap M Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(2A):999-1006. PubMed ID: 12820338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA and cell cycle analysis as prognostic indicators in breast tumors revisited. Bagwell CB; Clark GM; Spyratos F; Chassevent A; Bendahl PO; Stål O; Killander D; Jourdan ML; Romain S; Hunsberger B; Wright S; Baldetorp B Clin Lab Med; 2001 Dec; 21(4):875-95, x. PubMed ID: 11770293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA index as prognostic factor in breast cancer. Rzymowska J; Skierski J; Kurylcio L; Dyrda Z Neoplasma; 1995; 42(5):239-42. PubMed ID: 8552202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accumulation of multiple genetic abnormalities in individual tumor cells in human breast cancers: clinical prognostic implications. Shackney SE; Pollice AA; Smith CA; Alston L; Singh SG; Janocko LE; Brown KA; Petruolo S; Groft DW; Yakulis R; Hartsock RJ Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 9166508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fluorescence-based analysis of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation within fine-needle samplings of breast tumors: a new approach using automated image cytometry. Truong K; Vielh P; Malfoy B; Klijanienko J; Dutrillaux B; Bourgeois CA Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):309-16. PubMed ID: 9801206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flow cytometry and quantitative immunohistochemical study of cell cycle regulation proteins in invasive breast carcinoma: prognostic significance. Michels JJ; Duigou F; Marnay J; Henry-Amar M; Delozier T; Denoux Y; Chasle J Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1376-86. PubMed ID: 12627500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in lymph-node-negative breast cancer by image and flow cytometric analysis. Peiró G; Lerma E; Climent MA; Seguí MA; Alonso MC; Prat J Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 9071729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A technique for automatic/interactive assessment of the proliferating fraction of neoplastic cells in solid tumors. A methodological study on the Ki-67 immunoreactive cells in human mammary carcinomas, including a comparison with the results of conventional S-phase fraction assessments by means of DNA cytometry. Parrado C; Falkmer UG; Höög A; Falkmer S; Ahrens O; Rius F; Grimelius L Gen Diagn Pathol; 1996 Mar; 141(3-4):215-27. PubMed ID: 8705786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Flow cytometry-pathology combined study of breast cancer]. Yu ZY; Yu JM; Wu TH; Zhuo PY; Wang SF; Li M; Zhang X; Lü BY; Liu YB Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 27(7):420-2. PubMed ID: 16188128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mitosin (a new proliferation marker) correlates with clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Clark GM; Allred DC; Hilsenbeck SG; Chamness GC; Osborne CK; Jones D; Lee WH Cancer Res; 1997 Dec; 57(24):5505-8. PubMed ID: 9407959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of threshold values for determining the size of the fraction of steroid hormone receptor-positive tumor cells in paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas. Leers MP; Hoop JG; van Beers M; van Rodijnen N; Pannebakker M; Nap M Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2005 Mar; 64(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 15668953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]