These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8193568)

  • 1. Predictors of clinical wear of restorative dental composite materials.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 8193568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Composite resins in the 21st century.
    Willems G; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Sep; 24(9):641-58. PubMed ID: 8272502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Lewis G
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1803330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage.
    Tjandrawinata R; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15853111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of secondary curing on indirect posterior composite resins.
    Reinhardt JW; Boyer DB; Stephens NH
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):217-20. PubMed ID: 9028240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and computational approach for evaluating the mechanical characteristics of dental composite resins with various filler sizes.
    Tanimoto Y; Kitagawa T; Aida M; Nishiyama N
    Acta Biomater; 2006 Nov; 2(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 16950668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture.
    Ichim IP; Schmidlin PR; Li Q; Kieser JA; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1562-9. PubMed ID: 17391747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of material properties of composite restoration on the strength of the restoration-dentine interface due to polymerization shrinkage, thermal and occlusal loading.
    Borkowski K; Kotousov A; Kahler B
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jul; 29(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 17000129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison between hybrid composites and amalgam for posterior restorations].
    Favero L; Berengo M; Pellegrini F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2485794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of aging on mechanical properties of composite restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation approach.
    Yap AU; Chung SM; Rong Y; Tsai KT
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 15470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration.
    Choi KK; Ryu GJ; Choi SM; Lee MJ; Park SJ; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 15279488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
    Nayak UA; Suasha P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.