These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8193840)
1. Human tissue research: is legislation needed? Leadbeatter S Br J Hosp Med; 1994 Feb 2-15; 51(3):132-3. PubMed ID: 8193840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Body parts as property. Brahams D Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():45-7. PubMed ID: 9717361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Body of research--ownership and use of human tissue. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2006 Oct; 355(15):1517-9. PubMed ID: 17035644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The recognition of proprietary rights in human tissue in common law jurisdictions. Magnusson RS Melb Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 18():601-29. PubMed ID: 16523581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Who deserves the patent pot of gold?: an inquiry into the proper inventorship of patient-based discoveries. Ho CM DePaul J Health Care Law; 2004; 7(2):185-243. PubMed ID: 15675072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicine's rude awakening to the commercial world. Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9207):857. PubMed ID: 10752695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a just model of alienability of human tissue. Budds B Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):757-82. PubMed ID: 16514784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. First Moore, then Hecht: isn't it time we recognize a property interest in tissues, cells, and gametes? Jordan CM; Price CJ Real Property Probate Trust J; 2002; 37(1):151-90. PubMed ID: 15212039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biotechnology: a challenge for Hippocrates. Huynen S Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1991; 6(4):534-51. PubMed ID: 16127862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic non-discrimination, privacy and property rights. Stulic M E Law; 2000 Jun; 7(2):E5. PubMed ID: 16903021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin and bones: post-mortem markets in human tissue. Charo RA Nova Law Rev; 2002; 26(2):421-50. PubMed ID: 12627562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material. Seeney EB New Engl Law Rev; 1998; 32(4):1131-91. PubMed ID: 12778925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Making something into nothing: reforming the "no property" rule for human tissue. Rolf N J Law Med; 2013 Dec; 21(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 24597379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Security interests in human materials. Smith KH Hofstra Law Rev; 1999; 28(1):127-84. PubMed ID: 12769117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Something more to the story. Szostak DC J Leg Med; 2010 Oct; 31(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 21184318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A question of property rights in the human body. Marusyk RW; Swain MS Ottawa Law Rev; 1989; 21(2):351-86. PubMed ID: 16086463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Misappropriation of human eggs and embryos and the tort of conversion: a relational view. Fischer JD Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 32(2):381-429. PubMed ID: 12455505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California. LoBiondo AR Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal rights in transplantation: how adult stem cells may be defining and protecting the rights of donors. McIntire T Tenn Med; 2006 Apr; 99(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 16704128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]