These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8194018)

  • 1. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study.
    Dalton LW; Page DL; Dupont WD
    Cancer; 1994 Jun; 73(11):2765-70. PubMed ID: 8194018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.
    Dalton LW; Pinder SE; Elston CE; Ellis IO; Page DL; Dupont WD; Blamey RW
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 10912931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytologic grading of fine needle aspirates of breast carcinoma by private practice pathologists.
    Cajulis RS; Hessel RG; Frias-Hidvegi D; Yu GH
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 9100760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.
    Sikka M; Agarwal S; Bhatia A
    Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):149-53. PubMed ID: 10921219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
    Frierson HF; Wolber RA; Berean KW; Franquemont DW; Gaffey MJ; Boyd JC; Wilbur DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 7856562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine-needle aspirates of the breast.
    Howell LP; Gandour-Edwards R; O'Sullivan D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8135179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement.
    Robbins P; Pinder S; de Klerk N; Dawkins H; Harvey J; Sterrett G; Ellis I; Elston C
    Hum Pathol; 1995 Aug; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 7635449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver variability in breast carcinoma grading results in prognostic stage differences.
    Rabe K; Snir OL; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Celli R; Reisenbichler ES
    Hum Pathol; 2019 Dec; 94():51-57. PubMed ID: 31655171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.
    Ginter PS; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar A; Wilson P; Harigopal M
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Apr; 34(4):701-709. PubMed ID: 33077923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Sneige N; Lagios MD; Schwarting R; Colburn W; Atkinson E; Weber D; Sahin A; Kemp B; Hoque A; Risin S; Sabichi A; Boone C; Dhingra K; Kelloff G; Lippman S
    Hum Pathol; 1999 Mar; 30(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 10088542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer histologic grading using digital microscopy: concordance and outcome association.
    Rakha EA; Aleskandarani M; Toss MS; Green AR; Ball G; Ellis IO; Dalton LW
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Aug; 71(8):680-686. PubMed ID: 29535212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
    Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver reproducibility among neuropathologists and surgical pathologists in fibrillary astrocytoma grading.
    Prayson RA; Agamanolis DP; Cohen ML; Estes ML; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK; Abdul-Karim F; McClure SP; Sebek BA; Vinay R
    J Neurol Sci; 2000 Apr; 175(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 10785254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.
    Meyer JS; Alvarez C; Milikowski C; Olson N; Russo I; Russo J; Glass A; Zehnbauer BA; Lister K; Parwaresch R;
    Mod Pathol; 2005 Aug; 18(8):1067-78. PubMed ID: 15920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cytologic nuclear grade of malignant breast aspirates as a predictor of histologic grade. Light microscopy and image analysis characteristics.
    Moroz K; Lipscomb J; Vial LJ; Dhurandhar N
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9250307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
    Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?
    Adams AL; Chhieng DC; Bell WC; Winokur T; Hameed O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Aug; 13(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 19608079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prognostic value of p53 and c-erb B-2 immunostaining is overrated for patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 613 patients with a follow-up of 14-30 years.
    Reed W; Hannisdal E; Boehler PJ; Gundersen S; Host H; Marthin J
    Cancer; 2000 Feb; 88(4):804-13. PubMed ID: 10679650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
    Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.
    Schuh F; Biazús JV; Resetkova E; Benfica CZ; Ventura Ade F; Uchoa D; Graudenz M; Edelweiss MI
    Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():93. PubMed ID: 26159429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.