These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8194018)

  • 21. Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of invasive breast cancer: A nationwide study of 33,043 patients in the Netherlands.
    van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Kuijpers CCHJ; van der Wall E; Overbeek LIH; Deckers IAG
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Feb; 146(3):769-780. PubMed ID: 30977119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of grading of non-invasive urothelial carcinoma by digital pathology for routine diagnosis.
    Colling R; Colling H; Browning L; Verrill C
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):995. PubMed ID: 34488682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Histologic grading in breast cancer--reproducibility between seven pathologic departments. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group.
    Boiesen P; Bendahl PO; Anagnostaki L; Domanski H; Holm E; Idvall I; Johansson S; Ljungberg O; Ringberg A; Ostberg G; Fernö M
    Acta Oncol; 2000; 39(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10752652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of new classification schemes for the pathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Bethwaite P; Smith N; Delahunt B; Kenwright D
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 51(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 9771444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproducibility of two malignancy grading systems with reportedly prognostic value for oral cancer patients.
    Bryne M; Nielsen K; Koppang HS; Dabelsteen E
    J Oral Pathol Med; 1991 Sep; 20(8):369-72. PubMed ID: 1719194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variation among pathologists in the histologic grading of canine cutaneous mast cell tumors with uniform use of a single grading reference.
    Northrup NC; Howerth EW; Harmon BG; Brown CA; Carmicheal KP; Garcia AP; Latimer KS; Munday JS; Rakich PM; Richey LJ; Stedman NL; Gieger TL
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2005 Nov; 17(6):561-4. PubMed ID: 16475514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subjective breast cancer grading. Analyses of reproducibility after application of Bayesian belief networks.
    Kronqvist P; Montironi R; Kuopio T; Collan YU
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 9349902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Reproducibility of histoprognostic grades of invasive breast cancer].
    Jacquemier J; Charpin C
    Ann Pathol; 1998 Nov; 18(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 9864574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward.
    van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Ellis IO
    Virchows Arch; 2022 Jan; 480(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 34196797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The efficacy and limitations of repeated slide conferences for improving interobserver agreement when judging nuclear atypia of breast cancer. The Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) Pathology Section.
    Tsuda H; Akiyama F; Kurosumi M; Sakamoto G; Watanabe T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Feb; 29(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 10089946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Histological grading of breast cancer. Interobserver, reproducibility and prognostic significance.
    Theissig F; Kunze KD; Haroske G; Meyer W
    Pathol Res Pract; 1990 Dec; 186(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 1964730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
    Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of the Ki67 labeling index: a Japanese validation ring study.
    Niikura N; Sakatani T; Arima N; Ohi Y; Honma N; Kanomata N; Yoshida K; Kadoya T; Tamaki K; Kumaki N; Iwamoto T; Sugie T; Moriya T
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 24794952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monitoring of interobserver agreement in nuclear atypia scoring of node-negative breast carcinomas judged at individual collaborating hospitals in the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) protocol.
    Tsuda H; Akiyama F; Kurosumi M; Sakamoto G; Watanabe T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):413-20. PubMed ID: 10563193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-observer agreement among pathologists in grading the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Mukai H; Akiyama F; Arihiro K; Masuda S; Kurosumi M; Kodama Y; Horii R; Tsuda H
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Jan; 25(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28856554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of an increase in grading categories and double reporting on the reliability of breast cancer grade.
    Chowdhury N; Pai MR; Lobo FD; Kini H; Varghese R
    APMIS; 2007 Apr; 115(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 17504304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Routine morphometrical analysis can improve reproducibility of dysplasia grade in Barrett's oesophagus surveillance biopsies.
    Baak JP; ten Kate FJ; Offerhaus GJ; van Lanschot JJ; Meijer GA
    J Clin Pathol; 2002 Dec; 55(12):910-6. PubMed ID: 12461055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scoring nuclear pleomorphism in breast cancer.
    Dunne B; Going JJ
    Histopathology; 2001 Sep; 39(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 11532036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mitotic count by phosphohistone H3 immunohistochemical staining predicts survival and improves interobserver reproducibility in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.
    Voss SM; Riley MP; Lokhandwala PM; Wang M; Yang Z
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Jan; 39(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 25353284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nuclear grading in invasive ductal breast carcinomas.
    Kalogeraki A; Tamiolakis D; Kozoni V; Tzardi M; Panayiotides J; Melissas J; Zoras O; Tsiftsis D; Delides GS
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2000; 24(3):224-7. PubMed ID: 10975283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.