222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8194676)
1. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
Plomp R
Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.
Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():196-201. PubMed ID: 2356727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
Mens LH
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: differences and similarities in binaural performance.
Köbler S; Lindblad AC; Olofsson A; Hagerman B
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):613-27. PubMed ID: 20707668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion.
Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Maas P; Nielsen C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 21275499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Li N; Rodriguez J; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1598-606. PubMed ID: 23464029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Syllabic compression and speech intelligibility in hearing impaired listeners.
Verschuure J; Dreschler WA; de Haan EH; van Cappellen M; Hammerschlag R; Maré MJ; Maas AJ; Hijmans AC
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():92-100. PubMed ID: 8153570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.
De Gennaro S; Braida LD; Durlach NI
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3958996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of single-channel phonemic compression schemes on the understanding of speech by hearing-impaired listeners.
Goedegebure A; Hulshof M; Maas RJ; Dreschler WA; Verschuure H
Audiology; 2001; 40(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 11296937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
