These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8195397)
1. Detection of bacteremia by Difco ESP blood culture system. Morello JA; Leitch C; Nitz S; Dyke JW; Andruszewski M; Maier G; Landau W; Beard MA J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Mar; 32(3):811-8. PubMed ID: 8195397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical comparison of difco ESP, Wampole isolator, and Becton Dickinson Septi-Chek aerobic blood culturing systems. Cockerill FR; Torgerson CA; Reed GS; Vetter EA; Weaver AL; Dale JC; Roberts GD; Henry NK; Ilstrup DM; Rosenblatt JE J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 34(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8748264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Bactec 9240 and Difco ESP blood culture systems for detection of organisms from vials whose entry was delayed. Chapin K; Lauderdale TL J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Mar; 34(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 8904411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections. Ziegler R; Johnscher I; Martus P; Lenhardt D; Just HM J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems. Zwadyk P; Pierson CL; Young C J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1273-9. PubMed ID: 8051256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent-sensor technology (BACTEC 9240). Nolte FS; Williams JM; Jerris RC; Morello JA; Leitch CD; Matushek S; Schwabe LD; Dorigan F; Kocka FE J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Mar; 31(3):552-7. PubMed ID: 8458950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections. Cockerill FR; Reed GS; Hughes JG; Torgerson CA; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Dale JC; Roberts GD; Ilstrup DM; Henry NK J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 35(6):1469-72. PubMed ID: 9163464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240. Shigei JT; Shimabukuro JA; Pezzlo MT; de la Maza LM; Peterson EM J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1385-8. PubMed ID: 7615763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter clinical comparison of resin-containing bottles with standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles for culture of microorganisms from blood. Lelièvre H; Gimenez M; Vandenesch F; Reinhardt A; Lenhardt D; Just HM; Pau M; Ausina V; Etienne J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 16(9):669-74. PubMed ID: 9352260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles. Wilson ML; Harrell LJ; Mirrett S; Weinstein MP; Stratton CW; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 1734069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood. Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients. Roh KH; Kim JY; Kim HN; Lee HJ; Sohn JW; Kim MJ; Cho Y; Kim YK; Lee CK Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jul; 73(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 22541787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. Doern GV; Barton A; Rao S J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 36(9):2686-9. PubMed ID: 9705414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of isolator and thiol broth with ESP aerobic and anaerobic bottles for recovery of pathogens from blood. Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Manzella JP; Parsey KS; Scott SL; Cavanaugh SH J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2050-5. PubMed ID: 7814524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of BACTEC 9240 blood culture system by using high-volume aerobic resin media. Schwabe LD; Thomson RB; Flint KK; Koontz FP J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2451-3. PubMed ID: 7494044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter comparison of BACTEC 9050 and BACTEC 9240 blood culture systems. Murray PR; Hollick GE; Jerris RC; Wilson ML J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1601-3. PubMed ID: 9620384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems. Fiori B; D'Inzeo T; Di Florio V; De Maio F; De Angelis G; Giaquinto A; Campana L; Tanzarella E; Tumbarello M; Antonelli M; Sanguinetti M; Spanu T J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 52(10):3558-67. PubMed ID: 25031441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital. Smith JA; Bryce EA; Ngui-Yen JH; Roberts FJ J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Jul; 33(7):1905-8. PubMed ID: 7665668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]