BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8195734)

  • 21. Reversible contraception for the woman over 35 years of age.
    Archer DF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 4(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 1450355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women.
    Kalmuss D; Davidson AR; Cushman LF; Heartwell S; Rulin M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(6):256-60. PubMed ID: 8959415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Tolerance and acceptability of Norplant contraceptive devices].
    Ba MG; Moreau JC; Diadhiou F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Dec; 31(8):765-71. PubMed ID: 12592196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Attitudes towards contraception and some reasons for discontinuation].
    Lodewijckx E
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Nov; 15(11):1025-30. PubMed ID: 12341566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.
    Bigrigg A; Evans M; Gbolade B; Newton J; Pollard L; Szarewski A; Thomas C; Walling M
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 10454658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Norplant implants in Ethiopia.
    Argina H; Lukman HY
    East Afr Med J; 1997 Apr; 74(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 9299831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subdermal progestin implant contraception.
    Darney PD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 1908716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A prospective comparison of bone density in adolescent girls receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), levonorgestrel (Norplant), or oral contraceptives.
    Cromer BA; Blair JM; Mahan JD; Zibners L; Naumovski Z
    J Pediatr; 1996 Nov; 129(5):671-6. PubMed ID: 8917232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contraceptive outcomes among adolescents prescribed Norplant implants versus oral contraceptives after one year of use.
    Berenson AB; Wiemann CM; Rickerr VI; McCombs SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 176(3):586-92. PubMed ID: 9077611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implantable contraception.
    Bardin CW
    Curr Ther Endocrinol Metab; 1997; 6():292-300. PubMed ID: 9174757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant.
    Lynn MM; Holdcroft C
    Nurse Pract; 1992 Mar; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 1565306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Innovations in contraception: the Norplant system.
    Klaisle CM; Wysocki S
    NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 1596435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study.
    Berenson AB; Wiemann CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 172(4 Pt 1):1128-35; discussion 1135-7. PubMed ID: 7726249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implant contraception in Singaporean women: one decade of experience in KK Women's and Children's Hospital.
    Kang W; Tan KH
    Singapore Med J; 2004 Oct; 45(10):482-6. PubMed ID: 15455169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acceptance and perceptions of NORPLANT among users in San Francisco, USA.
    Darney PD; Atkinson E; Tanner S; MacPherson S; Hellerstein S; Alvarado A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1990; 21(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 2115699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Norplant system: an effective, long term contraceptive of the 20th century.
    Merino G; Murrieta S; Moran C; Hafez ES
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1994; 10(3-4):217-34. PubMed ID: 12287840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Injectable and implantable contraceptives.
    Cullins VE
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 1387011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contraceptive implants.
    Ladipo O; Coutinho EM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 6(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 7893965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acceptability of levonorgestrel subdermal implants versus tubal ligation for long-term contraception in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Mitchel MJ; Thistle P
    Contraception; 2004 Dec; 70(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 15541410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preliminary report on characteristics of women participating in the meeting of the Oral Contraceptive Pill Members Club at Siriraj Hospital.
    Thamkhantho M; Jivasak-Apimas S; Chiravacharadej G; Inthawong J; Butrpetch K; Harnnarong B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 18697373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.