These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships. Campos AA; Nathanson D J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study. Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic Appearance of Interocclusal Record Materials for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Implant Surgeries. Mohunta VV; McGlumphy EA; Kim DG; Azer SS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 28494032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials. Chun JH; Pae A; Kim SH Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18614226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models. Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials. Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship. Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of eight elastomeric occlusal registration materials. Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Dec; 143(12):1358-60. PubMed ID: 23204094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction. Tan E; Chai J Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Kinderknecht KE J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8164168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy. Tan E; Chai J; Wozniak WT Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8639243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material. Vivas JL; Sierraalta M J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods. Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):395-400; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 12017459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]