These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8196110)

  • 1. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a case for empirical treatment.
    Gunn RA; Spitters CE
    JAMA; 1994 Jun; 271(22):1741-2. PubMed ID: 8196110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Major improvements in cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis using pooled urine specimens and high performance testing.
    Morré SA; Welte R; Postma MJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Feb; 78(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 11872874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection: cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
    Habets PC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(10):499-501. PubMed ID: 11268916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. The case for screening is made, but much detail remains to be worked out.
    Boag F; Kelly F
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7143):1474. PubMed ID: 9582128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male students by examination of first catch urine.
    Berry J; Crowley T; Horner P; Clifford J; Paul ID; Caul EO
    Genitourin Med; 1995 Oct; 71(5):329-31. PubMed ID: 7490057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Rasmussen KL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Apr; 158(18):2560-1. PubMed ID: 8686014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in a Turkish population.
    Ertem E; Dereli D; Serter D; Yüce K
    Genitourin Med; 1991 Aug; 67(4):354-5. PubMed ID: 1916803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis?].
    Olesen F; Ostergaard LJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Aug; 159(34):5069. PubMed ID: 9283249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sports preparticipation examination to screen college athletes for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hennrikus E; Oberto D; Linder JM; Rempel JM; Hennrikus N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Apr; 42(4):683-8. PubMed ID: 21099757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and laboratory screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women at a university health service.
    Pereira CA; Paquette GE; Wood PB; Grant SA
    J Am Coll Health; 1987 Jul; 36(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 3624655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening pregnant women in the 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Joseph Davey D; Medline A; Klausner JD
    Int J STD AIDS; 2016 Oct; 27(12):1134-1136. PubMed ID: 27694561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which target group and at what price?].
    Postma MJ; van den Hoek JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jun; 143(23):1237-8. PubMed ID: 10428675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The silent epidemic of Chlamydia trachomatis: the urgent need for detection and treatment in women.
    Walsh C; Anderson LA; Irwin K
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 May; 9(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 10868604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Urine samples for screening of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young male recruits].
    Jensen IP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May; 155(18):1376-8. PubMed ID: 8497970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
    Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chlamydia trachomatis in Canada: an update.
    Squires S; Chaly B; Wilk T; Doherty J
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 1997 Aug; 23(15):113-20. PubMed ID: 9439038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among young German adolescents, 2005-06.
    Desai S; Meyer T; Thamm M; Hamouda O; Bremer V
    Sex Health; 2011 Mar; 8(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 21371394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
    Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening young men for chlamydial infection.
    Aronson MD; Phillips RS
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2097-8. PubMed ID: 8411579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.