These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The GEDNAP (German DNA profiling group) blind trial concept. Rand S; Schürenkamp M; Brinkmann B Int J Legal Med; 2002 Aug; 116(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 12185489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and exploitation of DNA fingerprinting technology in India. Singh L Biotechnol J; 2009 Mar; 4(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 19296453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA fingerprinting: informed consent and the admissibility of evidence. Horton G Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Aug; 7(1):165-89. PubMed ID: 11659595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Paternity testing in the genetic era. Caulfield T Health Law Can; 1996 Aug; 17(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 11645328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough? Buckleton J; Triggs CM Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):115-9. PubMed ID: 15978337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA data banking: the dangerous erosion of privacy. Shapiro ED; Weinberg ML Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(3):455-86. PubMed ID: 11651144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the DNA profile as the unique patient identifier in the Community Health Information Network: legal implications. Dahm LL John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 1997; 15():227-75. PubMed ID: 11658118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Did the O.J. Simpson case teach us anything--when science meets the courtroom]. Sajantila A Duodecim; 1999; 115(14):1519-20. PubMed ID: 11912639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Convict DNA bank unconstitutional? Science; 1998 Aug; 281(5380):1121. PubMed ID: 11645093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Population genetics and paternity in Rasa Aragonesa sheep using DNA fingerprinting. Ferreira E; Monteagudo LV; Tejedor MT; Arruga MV Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10425236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Full siblings impersonating parent/child prove most difficult to discredit with DNA profiling alone. Fung WK; Wong DM; Hu YQ Transfusion; 2004 Oct; 44(10):1513-5. PubMed ID: 15383026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal protests prompt DNA primer release. Smaglik P Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6794):336. PubMed ID: 10935607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials. Roberts H Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Interpretation of DNA profiles for mixed stains]. Lu DJ; Lu HL; Chen YC Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 18(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 12608297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners. Love SH Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]