These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8197239)

  • 1. Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain.
    Stratford PW; Binkley J; Solomon P; Gill C; Finch E
    Phys Ther; 1994 Jun; 74(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 8197239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
    Fritz JM; Irrgang JJ
    Phys Ther; 2001 Feb; 81(2):776-88. PubMed ID: 11175676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.
    Davidson M; Keating JL
    Phys Ther; 2002 Jan; 82(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 11784274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.
    Grotle M; Brox JI; Vøllestad NK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):E492-501. PubMed ID: 15507789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thai version of the Functional Rating Index for patients with back and neck pain: Part II responsiveness and head-to-head comparisons.
    Chansirinukor W
    Physiother Res Int; 2019 Jan; 24(1):e1751. PubMed ID: 30284353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
    Frost H; Lamb SE; Stewart-Brown S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 18824951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Oct; 7():82. PubMed ID: 17064410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2.
    Riddle DL; Stratford PW; Binkley JM
    Phys Ther; 1998 Nov; 78(11):1197-207. PubMed ID: 9806624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1.
    Stratford PW; Binkley JM; Riddle DL; Guyatt GH
    Phys Ther; 1998 Nov; 78(11):1186-96. PubMed ID: 9806623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
    Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.
    Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1717-28. PubMed ID: 16736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery.
    Ostelo RW; de Vet HC; Knol DL; van den Brandt PA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Mar; 57(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 15066687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire.
    Stratford PW; Binkley J; Solomon P; Finch E; Gill C; Moreland J
    Phys Ther; 1996 Apr; 76(4):359-65; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 8606899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain.
    Resnik L; Dobrykowski E
    Orthop Nurs; 2005; 24(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 15722968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire.
    Page SJ; Shawaryn MA; Cernich AN; Linacre JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 83(11):1579-84. PubMed ID: 12422329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial and subgroup analysis to compare flexion-distraction with active exercise for chronic low back pain.
    Gudavalli MR; Cambron JA; McGregor M; Jedlicka J; Keenum M; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jul; 15(7):1070-82. PubMed ID: 16341712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Roland Morris Questionnaire in Colombia to Evaluate Disability in Low Back Pain.
    Payares K; Lugo LH; Restrepo A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(14):1108-14. PubMed ID: 25943080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure pain thresholds in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
    Imamura M; Alfieri FM; Filippo TR; Battistella LR
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 29(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 26406214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observed outcomes associated with a quota-based exercise approach on measures of kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Kernan T; Rainville J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2007 Nov; 37(11):679-87. PubMed ID: 18057675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.