These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8197464)

  • 1. [Practical and theoretical limits of score systems].
    Waydhas C; Nast-Kolb D; Ruchholtz S; Schweiberer L
    Unfallchirurg; 1994 Apr; 97(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 8197464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consensus or data-derived anatomic injury severity scoring?
    Moore L; Lavoie A; Le Sage N; Bergeron E; Emond M; Abdous B
    J Trauma; 2008 Feb; 64(2):420-6. PubMed ID: 18301208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of various trauma score systems. An overview].
    Oestern HJ; Kabus K
    Unfallchirurg; 1994 Apr; 97(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 8197463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Trauma scores: reproducibility and reliability].
    Waydhas C; Nast-Kolb D; Trupka A; Kerim-Sade C; Kanz G; Zoller J; Schweiberer L
    Unfallchirurg; 1992 Feb; 95(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 1570531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation between survival time and severity of injuries in fatal injuries in traffic accidents].
    Nikolić S; Micić J; Mihailović Z
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(11-12):291-5. PubMed ID: 11928613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score?
    Aydin SA; Bulut M; Ozgüç H; Ercan I; Türkmen N; Eren B; Esen M
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2008 Oct; 14(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 18988055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Value of clinical scoring systems for evaluation of injury severity and as an instrument for quality management of severely injured patients].
    Bouillon B; Neugebauer E; Rixen D; Lefering R; Tiling T
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(11):914-23. PubMed ID: 9027148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Role of anatomic and physiologic trauma scoring systems in forensic cases].
    Eryilmaz M; Durusu M; Cantürk G; Menteş MO; Ozer MT; Cevik E; Törer N; Avci A; Kaldirim U
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 May; 15(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 19562553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of "life threatening injury" concept in the Turkish Penal Code and trauma scoring systems.
    Fedakar R; Aydiner AH; Ercan I
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2007 Jul; 13(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 17978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring.
    Kilgo PD; Osler TM; Meredith W
    J Trauma; 2003 Oct; 55(4):599-606; discussion 606-7. PubMed ID: 14566109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prognostic importance of trauma scoring systems for blunt thoracic trauma.
    Esme H; Solak O; Yurumez Y; Yavuz Y; Terzi Y; Sezer M; Kucuker H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 55(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 17410508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [What is the value of score systems?].
    Neugebauer E; Bouillon B
    Unfallchirurg; 1994 Apr; 97(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 8197462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preventability classification in mortality cases: a reliability study.
    Pasquale MD; Peitzman AB;
    J Trauma; 2009 Nov; 67(5):1097-102. PubMed ID: 19901674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk stratification simplified: the worst injury predicts mortality for the injured children.
    Tepas JJ; Leaphart CL; Celso BG; Tuten JD; Pieper P; Ramenofsky ML
    J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1258-61; discussion 1261-3. PubMed ID: 19077610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional recovery at a minimum of 2 years after multiple injury-development of an outcome score.
    Weninger P; Aldrian S; Koenig F; Vécsei V; Nau T
    J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):799-808; discussion 808. PubMed ID: 18849794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated severity scoring in level I trauma patients.
    Kearney TJ; Shabot MM
    Am Surg; 1994 Jun; 60(6):391-3. PubMed ID: 8198325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Trauma score systems as instruments in quality control. A prospective study on validation of 7 trauma score systems with 612 trauma patients].
    Bouillon B; Krämer M; Tiling T; Neugebauer E
    Unfallchirurg; 1993 Feb; 96(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 8451650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative results of trauma scoring systems in fatal outcomes.
    Cinelli SM; Brady P; Rennie CP; Tuluca C; Hall TS
    Conn Med; 2009 May; 73(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 19441759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available.
    Kilgo PD; Meredith JW; Osler TM
    J Trauma; 2006 May; 60(5):1002-8; discussion 1008-9. PubMed ID: 16688062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expert consensus vs empirical estimation of injury severity: effect on quality measurement in trauma.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Meredith W; Dick AW
    Arch Surg; 2009 Apr; 144(4):326-32; discussion 332. PubMed ID: 19380645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.