These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8198351)

  • 21. Article review process.
    Burr G
    Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
    Glimelius B
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What can authors do for the papers they published in predatory journals?
    Dadkhah M; Darbani SM
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2016 Aug; 126(7-8):574-5. PubMed ID: 27510167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer-Review Mentorship: What It Is and Why We Need It.
    Haase KR; Dzurec L
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2019; 42(3):191-192. PubMed ID: 31356351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On proposing special issues for the Journal of Youth and Adolescence.
    Levesque RJ
    J Youth Adolesc; 2012 Dec; 41(12):1688-90. PubMed ID: 23095906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Structured abstracts.
    Lock S
    BMJ; 1988 Jul; 297(6642):156. PubMed ID: 3044505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blind dates in sciences: dealing with rejection in peer review.
    Wang Y
    Circ Res; 2014 Mar; 114(6):944-6. PubMed ID: 24625725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diversity, debate, and discourse.
    Haller KB
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(4):283. PubMed ID: 1941289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Citation marketing and networking.
    Couée I
    Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Aug; 98(8):717-8. PubMed ID: 21656200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When papers go bad--part 1, by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2004 Dec; 117(Pt 25):5953-4. PubMed ID: 15678575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predatory publishers.
    Odom-Forren J
    J Perianesth Nurs; 2015 Apr; 30(2):87. PubMed ID: 25813294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From manuscript to publication.
    Yoder Wise PS
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 1992; 23(2):51. PubMed ID: 1564167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Journal evaluation: why and how?
    Satyanarayana K
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 1993 Apr; 12 Suppl 1():S5-8. PubMed ID: 8325673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical editor lambasts journals and editors.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7314):651. PubMed ID: 11566822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.