These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8200463)

  • 1. Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitals.
    Elferink-Stinkens PM; Van Hemel OJ; Brand R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1994 Mar; 53(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 8200463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences.
    Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; le Cessie S; Van Hemel OJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):97-103. PubMed ID: 8886689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomised clinical trial on the effect of the Dutch obstetric peer review system.
    Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; Amelink-Verburg MP; Merkus JM; den Ouden AL; Van Hemel OJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Apr; 102(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 12039085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe.
    Bergsjø P; Schmidt E; Pusch D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Jul; 90(7):628-32. PubMed ID: 6871130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effects of labor induction on the progress of childbirth].
    Gucciardo L; Thoumsin H; Foidart JM
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Nov; 53(11):665-8. PubMed ID: 9887658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993-2002.
    Kwee A; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Reuwer PJ; Bruinse HW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16884843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in management and results in term-delivery in nine European referral hospitals: descriptive study.
    Alran S; Sibony O; Oury JF; Luton D; Blot P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Jun; 103(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 12039455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in caesarean section rates among high- and medium-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands 1983-1992.
    Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; Van Hemel OJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Apr; 59(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 7657010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Is a cesarean section rate of less than 12% possible in a tertiary level hospital center?].
    Blouin D
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 1570665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric characteristics profiles as quality assessment of obstetric care.
    Elferink-Stinkens PM; Van Hemel OJ; Hermans MP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Oct; 51(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 8119465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labor induction rate variation in upstate New York: what is the difference?
    Glantz JC
    Birth; 2003 Sep; 30(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 12911799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. trends in obstetric procedures, 1990-2000.
    Kozak LJ; Weeks JD
    Birth; 2002 Sep; 29(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12153645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regional variation in obstetrical intervention for hospital birth in the Republic of Ireland, 2005-2009.
    Lutomski JE; Morrison JJ; Lydon-Rochelle MT
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Nov; 12():123. PubMed ID: 23126584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjaerven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1642-51. PubMed ID: 25100277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Labour and delivery interventions in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a population-based cohort study.
    Brown HK; Kirkham YA; Cobigo V; Lunsky Y; Vigod SN
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2016 Mar; 70(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 26449738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does advanced operative obstetrics still have a place in contemporary practice?
    Tempest N; Navaratnam K; Hapangama DK
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 25692505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The incidence of cesarean section and the means of delivery in women who have already had a cesarean].
    Cantagallo F; Perini M; Cantagallo AA; Bahri D; Ventura GC; Lotti O; Ventura G; Lotti R; Santilli C
    Minerva Ginecol; 1998 Sep; 50(9):373-8. PubMed ID: 9842205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countries.
    Stephenson PA; Bakoula C; Hemminki E; Knudsen L; Levasseur M; Schenker J; Stembera Z; Tiba J; Verbrugge HP; Zupan J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 7(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 8426831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.