BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8201047)

  • 1. A simple procedure for obtaining approximate interim cow solutions from an animal model.
    Weller JI; Israel C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1126-31. PubMed ID: 8201047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic value of herd life adjusted for milk production.
    Allaire FR; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 May; 75(5):1349-56. PubMed ID: 1597590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Animal model evaluations for Mexican Holsteins.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Apr; 74(4):1420-7. PubMed ID: 1860983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic evaluations for mixed-breed populations.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Wiggans GR; Megonigal JH
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2434-41. PubMed ID: 17430948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model.
    Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of test day models on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits.
    Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Apr; 78(4):929-38. PubMed ID: 7790586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of synchronization on genetic parameters of reproductive traits in dairy cattle.
    Goodling RC; Shook GE; Weigel KA; Zwald NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):2217-25. PubMed ID: 15905451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solving large test-day models by iteration on data and preconditioned conjugate gradient.
    Lidauer M; Strandén I; Mäntysaari EA; Pösö J; Kettunen A
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2788-96. PubMed ID: 10629827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Dairy Comp 305 module "Cow Value" in two Ontario dairy herds.
    Sorge US; Kelton DF; Lissemore KD; Sears W; Fetrow J
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5784-97. PubMed ID: 18024773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons.
    Banos G; Wiggans GR; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Nov; 84(11):2523-9. PubMed ID: 11768094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of correction for heterogeneity of variance on bias and accuracy of breeding value estimation for Dutch dairy cattle.
    van der Werf JH; Meuwissen TH; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3174-84. PubMed ID: 7836606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A spreadsheet-based model demonstrating the nonuniform economic effects of varying reproductive performance in Ohio dairy herds.
    Meadows C; Rajala-Schultz PJ; Frazer GS
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1244-54. PubMed ID: 15738258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model.
    Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An economic spreadsheet model to determine optimal breeding and replacement decisions for dairy cattle.
    Groenendaal H; Galligan DT; Mulder HA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jul; 87(7):2146-57. PubMed ID: 15328228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The association of herd milk production and management with a return-over-feed index in Ontario dairy herds.
    McLaren CJ; Lissemore KD; Duffield TF; Leslie KE; Kelton DF; Grexton B
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):419-25. PubMed ID: 15591408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.