These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8201065)

  • 1. Statistical analysis of ordinal categorical status after therapies.
    Grissom RJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Apr; 62(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 8201065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some methodological and statistical issues in the study of change processes in psychotherapy.
    Laurenceau JP; Hayes AM; Feldman GC
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 27(6):682-95. PubMed ID: 17328996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical significance testing and clinical trials.
    Krause MS
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2011 Sep; 48(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 21875234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some fallacies of statistical inferences about psychotherapy.
    Morstyn R
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1993 Mar; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 8481149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of pharmacological (amitriptyline HCL) and nonpharmacological (cognitive-behavioral) therapies for chronic tension headaches.
    Holroyd KA; Nash JM; Pingel JD; Cordingley GE; Jerome A
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1991 Jun; 59(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 2071723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the next generation of process research.
    Pachankis JE; Goldfried MR
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 27(6):760-8. PubMed ID: 17316940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Dodo Bird Verdict--controversial, inevitable and important: a commentary on 30 years of meta-analyses.
    Budd R; Hughes I
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2009; 16(6):510-22. PubMed ID: 19728292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical reanalysis of a randomized trial of acupuncture for pain reveals positive effects as well as adverse treatment interactions on pain, attrition, and mortality.
    Shiflett SC; Schwartz GE
    Explore (NY); 2010; 6(4):246-55. PubMed ID: 20633839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of three methods of identifying reliable and clinically significant client changes: commentary on Hageman and Arrindell.
    Hsu LM
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1195-202; discussion 1219-33. PubMed ID: 10596465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of sampling in clinical trial design.
    Krause M; Lutz W; Boehnke JR
    Psychother Res; 2011 May; 21(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 21347979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale as a primary outcome measure in randomized, controlled trials of treatments for generalized anxiety disorder.
    Koerner N; Antony MM; Dugas MJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 2010 Jan; 167(1):103-4; author reply 104-5. PubMed ID: 20068126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The problem of randomization in psychotherapy studies].
    Klingberg S; Buchkremer G
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1999 Feb; 49(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 10098395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of random assignment on study outcome: an empirical examination.
    Ottenbacher K
    Control Clin Trials; 1992 Feb; 13(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 1315663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Peduzzi P; Henderson W; Hartigan P; Lavori P
    Epidemiol Rev; 2002; 24(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 12119853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of ordinal outcomes in vascular prevention trials: comparison with binary outcomes in published trials.
    Bath PM; Geeganage C; Gray LJ; Collier T; Pocock S
    Stroke; 2008 Oct; 39(10):2817-23. PubMed ID: 18669897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis.
    Wilson DB; Lipsey MW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):413-29. PubMed ID: 11778681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of raw mean differences.
    Bond CF; Wiitala WL; Richard FD
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 14664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical continuous-time sequential analysis: a strategy for clinical research.
    Gardner W
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1993 Dec; 61(6):975-83. PubMed ID: 8113498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P-values after repeated significance testing: a simple approximation method.
    Lee YJ; Quan H
    Stat Med; 1993 Apr; 12(7):675-84. PubMed ID: 8511443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating dose-response effects in psychological treatment trials: the role of instrumental variables.
    Maracy M; Dunn G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):191-215. PubMed ID: 19036909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.