These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8201114)

  • 1. Profile analysis and comodulation detection differences using narrow bands of noise and their relation to comodulation masking release.
    Fantini DA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2180-91. PubMed ID: 8201114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comodulation masking release as a function of level.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):829-35. PubMed ID: 1939887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers.
    Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.
    McFadden D; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):711-24. PubMed ID: 2212295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird.
    Langemann U; Klump GM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 26(7):1969-78. PubMed ID: 17897400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency.
    Fantini DA; Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2106-15. PubMed ID: 8473623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms.
    Borrill SJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetry of masking between noise and iterated rippled noise: evidence for time-interval processing in the auditory system.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Nobbe A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2096-107. PubMed ID: 11681387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some factors affecting the magnitude of comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC; Hall JW; Grose JH; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1694-702. PubMed ID: 2262626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ; Hall JW; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):435-51. PubMed ID: 8423260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.
    Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1944-56. PubMed ID: 3429732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of spectral shape in the barn owl auditory system.
    Langemann U; Zokoll MA; Klump GM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Oct; 191(10):889-901. PubMed ID: 16001185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.
    Ewert SD; Verhey JL; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2921-31. PubMed ID: 12509013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty about the correlation among temporal envelopes in two comodulation tasks.
    Wright BA; McFadden D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1339-50. PubMed ID: 2229669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The detectability of a tone added to narrow bands of equal-energy noise.
    Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3424-35. PubMed ID: 1619118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monaural envelope correlation perception, revisited: effects of bandwidth, frequency separation, duration, and relative level of the noise bands.
    Moore BC; Emmerich DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2628-33. PubMed ID: 2373797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release.
    McFadden D; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jul; 92(1):144-56. PubMed ID: 1512320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 2380440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can comodulation masking release occur when frequency changes could promote perceptual segregation of the on-frequency and flanking bands?
    Verhey JL; Epp B; Stasiak A; Winter IM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():475-82. PubMed ID: 23716254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.