51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8201115)
1. Effect of masker level on overshoot in running- and frozen-noise maskers.
von Klitzing R; Kohlrausch A
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2192-201. PubMed ID: 8201115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans.
Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):270-81. PubMed ID: 19173414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics".
Oberfeld D; Stahn P; Kuta M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99745. PubMed ID: 24937050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High Ripple-Density Resolution for Discriminating Between Rippled and Nonrippled Signals: Effect of Temporal Processing or Combination Products?
Nechaev DI; Milekhina ON; Tomozova MS; Supin AY
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211010163. PubMed ID: 33926309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brainstem Representation of Auditory Overshoot in Guinea Pigs Using Auditory Brainstem Responses.
Haddadzade Niri H; Pourbakht A; Rahbar N; Haghani H
Iran J Child Neurol; 2021; 15(2):41-56. PubMed ID: 36213160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.
Jennings SG
J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jun; 125(6):2279-2308. PubMed ID: 33909513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.
Jennings SG; Chen J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):211. PubMed ID: 32752781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence for Gain Reduction by a Precursor in an On-Frequency Forward Masking Paradigm.
Strickland EA; Salloom WB; Hegland EL
Acta Acust United Acust; 2018; 104(5):809-812. PubMed ID: 31736681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.
Wojtczak M; Klang AM; Torunsky NT
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 20(4):395-413. PubMed ID: 31140010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Masker Envelope Fluctuations on the Temporal Effect.
Jennings SG; Sivas K; Stone C
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 19(6):717-727. PubMed ID: 30128623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss.
Jennings SG; Chen J; Fultz SE; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2232. PubMed ID: 29716275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Olivocochlear Efferents in Animals and Humans: From Anatomy to Clinical Relevance.
Lopez-Poveda EA
Front Neurol; 2018; 9():197. PubMed ID: 29632514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal Effects on Monaural Amplitude-Modulation Sensitivity in Ipsilateral, Contralateral and Bilateral Noise.
Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; López-Bascuas LE; Lopez-Poveda EA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 19(2):147-161. PubMed ID: 29508100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of compression in the simultaneous masker phase effect.
Tabuchi H; Laback B; Necciari T; Majdak P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2680. PubMed ID: 27794305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.
Jennings SG; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2481. PubMed ID: 27794300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.
Rocchi F; Dylla ME; Bohlen PA; Ramachandran R
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():1-12. PubMed ID: 27770624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression.
Fletcher MD; Krumbholz K; de Boer J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 17(6):559-575. PubMed ID: 27550069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.
Roverud E; Strickland EA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3245-61. PubMed ID: 26627798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.
Beim JA; Elliott M; Oxenham AJ; Wojtczak M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):613-29. PubMed ID: 26153415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.
Roverud E; Strickland EA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1318-35. PubMed ID: 25786945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
