These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8201116)

  • 1. Modulation detection and discrimination with three-component signals.
    Edwards BW; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2202-12. PubMed ID: 8201116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3119-31. PubMed ID: 1474227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical modulation frequency based on detection of AM versus FM tones.
    Schorer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1054-7. PubMed ID: 3700860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of modulator asynchrony of sinusoidal and noise modulators on frequency and amplitude modulation detection interference.
    Gockel H; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2975-84. PubMed ID: 12509019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of frequency modulation (FM) in the presence of a second FM tone.
    Wilson AS; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1333-8. PubMed ID: 2229668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers.
    Lorenzi C; Simpson MI; Millman RE; Griffiths TD; Woods WP; Rees A; Green GG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2470-8. PubMed ID: 11757936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of modulation coherence on signal threshold in frequency-modulated noise bands.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 2212294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychoacoustic equivalence of frequency modulation and quasi-frequency modulation.
    Edwards BW; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1510-3. PubMed ID: 8176054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components.
    Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):949-61. PubMed ID: 8132909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Across-channel masking of changes in modulation depth for amplitude- and frequency-modulated signals.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Gaunt T; Child T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):327-47. PubMed ID: 1775646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-order temporal modulation transfer functions.
    Lorenzi C; Soares C; Vonner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1030-8. PubMed ID: 11519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.
    Banai K; Sabin AT; Wright BA
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):219-27. PubMed ID: 21664958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency modulation versus amplitude modulation discrimination: evidence for a second frequency modulation encoding mechanism.
    Edwards BW; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):733-40. PubMed ID: 7930074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude modulation depth discrimination of a sinusoidal carrier: effect of stimulus duration.
    Lee J; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3688-93. PubMed ID: 9193056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of modulation depth of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) noise.
    Wakefield GH; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1367-73. PubMed ID: 2229672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.
    Whiteford KL; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3093-104. PubMed ID: 26627783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination and identification of modulation rate using a noise carrier.
    Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2122-8. PubMed ID: 1597603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fringe effects in modulation masking.
    Bacon SP; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 1619121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of frequency and rate modulation by the chinchilla.
    Long GR; Clark WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1184-90. PubMed ID: 6725767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of the phase of amplitude modulation applied to different carriers: Effects of modulation rate and modulation depth for young and older subjects.
    Moore BCJ; Sęk AP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Sep; 146(3):1696. PubMed ID: 31590555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.