These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8201166)

  • 1. Daily disposed hydrogel lenses--a comparison with biweekly replacement.
    Snyder C; Hammack GG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Mar; 65(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 8201166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J; Young G; Hunt C; Henderson T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Chan B; Choy C; Ng V
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
    Dumbleton KA; Woods CA; Jones LW; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
    Dillehay SM; Miller MB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disposable lenses and the marginal dry eye patient.
    Jurkus JM; Gurkaynak D
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):756-9. PubMed ID: 7822672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectacles and custom toric hydrogel contact lenses: a comparison of vision.
    Hall DK; Ward JA; Edmondson W
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):783-7. PubMed ID: 7822676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient and practitioner compliance with silicone hydrogel and daily disposable lens replacement in the United States.
    Dumbleton K; Woods C; Jones L; Fonn D; Sarwer DB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):164-71. PubMed ID: 19516142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical benefits of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution in silicone hydrogel and soft contact lens users.
    Campbell R; Kame G; Leach N; Paul M; White E; Zigler L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Mar; 38(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 22297841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical evaluation of frequent replacement contact lenses on patients currently wearing premium reusable daily wear soft contact lenses.
    Nason RJ; Vogel H; Tarbell BJ; Yi FP; Mertz GW
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 8454836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical investigation of asmofilcon a silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Lakkis C; Vincent S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19258913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.
    Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ocular physiology and comfort in neophyte subjects fitted with daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Morgan PB; Chamberlain P; Moody K; Maldonado-Codina C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Jun; 36(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 23279732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of ocular comfort, vision, and SICS during silicone hydrogel contact lens daily wear.
    Diec J; Evans VE; Tilia D; Naduvilath T; Holden BA; Lazon de la Jara P
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22169881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers.
    Nason RJ; Boshnick EL; Cannon WM; Dubow BW; Freeman MI; Kame RT; Lanier JC; Lopanik RW; Quinn TG; Rigel LE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 7822675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial.
    Sankaridurg PR; Sweeney DF; Holden BA; Naduvilath T; Velala I; Gora R; Krishnamachary M; Rao GN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2327-34. PubMed ID: 14644714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective comparison of 2 daily disposable contact lenses: Focus Dailies with AquaRelease and Proclear 1-Day.
    Scott WL; Rein MJ; Pack LD
    Optometry; 2010 Jan; 81(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK.
    Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; Hernández-Verdejo JL; De Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 85(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 18772724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.