These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8202650)

  • 1. Fisher's game with the devil.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Feb; 13(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 8202650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization.
    Hall NS
    J Hist Biol; 2007; 40(2):295-325. PubMed ID: 18175604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fisher's randomization test and Darwin's data -- a footnote to the history of statistics.
    Jacquez JA; Jacquez GM
    Math Biosci; 2002; 180():23-8. PubMed ID: 12387914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of randomization and control in clinical trials.
    Urbach P
    Stat Med; 1993 Aug; 12(15-16):1421-31; discussion 1433-41. PubMed ID: 8248655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.
    Bridgman S; Engebretsen L; Dainty K; Kirkley A; Maffulli N;
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Nov; 19(9):1000-6. PubMed ID: 14608321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controversies concerning randomization and additivity in clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3729-53. PubMed ID: 15580598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misuse of randomization: a review of Chinese randomized trials of herbal medicines for chronic hepatitis B.
    Liu J; Kjaergard LL; Gluud C
    Am J Chin Med; 2002; 30(1):173-6. PubMed ID: 12067091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomization tests in clinical trials with multiple imputation for handling missing data.
    Ivanova A; Lederman S; Stark PB; Sullivan G; Vaughn B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 May; 32(3):441-449. PubMed ID: 35666618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A theoretical analysis showed that blinding cannot eliminate potential for bias associated with beliefs about allocation in randomized clinical trials.
    Mathieu E; Herbert RD; McGeechan K; Herbert JJ; Barratt AL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):667-71. PubMed ID: 24767518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on response-adaptive randomization.
    Berger VW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jan; 40():240. PubMed ID: 25545024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Potkin SG; Siu CO
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias.
    Järvinen TL; Sihvonen R; Bhandari M; Sprague S; Malmivaara A; Paavola M; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):769-72. PubMed ID: 24560088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Things we still haven't learned (so far).
    Ivarsson A; Andersen MB; Stenling A; Johnson U; Lindwall M
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):449-61. PubMed ID: 26442774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The blind leading the blind: use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials.
    Miller LE; Stewart ME
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 21070890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive allocation for binary outcomes using decreasingly informative priors.
    Sabo RT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):569-78. PubMed ID: 24697793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials with missing outcomes.
    Scharfstein DO; Daniels MJ; Robins JM
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):495-512. PubMed ID: 14557107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomization procedures in single-case intervention research contexts: (Some of) "the rest of the story".
    Levin JR; Kratochwill TR; Ferron JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Nov; 112(3):334-348. PubMed ID: 31709560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of adaptive two-stage double-arm clinical trials for dichotomous variables.
    Jiang Z; Xue F; Li C; Wang L; Cai H; Zhang C; Xia J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 20172053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.