These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8202653)

  • 1. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Feb; 13(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 8202653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Brand R; Kragt H
    Stat Med; 1992 Dec; 11(16):2077-82. PubMed ID: 1293669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis and the reversed Theorem of the Means.
    Edwardes MD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 26052955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis: reconciling the results of independent studies.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1995 Mar 15-Apr 15; 14(5-7):457-72. PubMed ID: 7792440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
    Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".
    Olkin I
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):297-9; discussion 300-1. PubMed ID: 8048979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incommunicable knowledge? Interpreting and applying the results of clinical trials and meta-analyses.
    Smith GD; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 51(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 9539883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What have we learned from meta-analysis?
    Stockler M; Coates A
    Med J Aust; 1993 Sep; 159(5):291-3. PubMed ID: 8361419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deficits and remedy of the standard random effects methods in meta-analysis.
    Ziegler S; Koch A; Victor N
    Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 11424301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis.
    Olkin I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):133-46; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 7853039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to interpret an overview: a meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and toxicity of Pneumocystis carinii prophylactic regimens.
    Easterbrook PJ
    Genitourin Med; 1997 Apr; 73(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 9215100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk.
    Papatheodorou SI; Tsilidis KK; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25433443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The likelihood ratio versus the p value in meta-analysis: where is the evidence? Comment on the paper by S. N. Goodman.
    Zucker D; Yusuf S
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):205-8; discussion 209-10. PubMed ID: 2666027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
    Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quasi-empirical Bayes methodology for improving meta-analysis.
    Saleh AK; Hassanein KM; Hassanein RS; Kim HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 16440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis and evidence.
    Goodman SN
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 2666026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.