These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8203127)

  • 1. Immunoblot studies in the differential diagnosis of porcine brucellosis: an immunodominant 62 kDa protein is related to the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (HSP-65).
    Spencer SA; Broughton ES; Hamid S; Young DB
    Vet Microbiol; 1994 Mar; 39(1-2):47-60. PubMed ID: 8203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
    Riber U; Jungersen G
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
    Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; Joyce MA; Fenwick S; Heesemann J; Wolf-Watz H; Nielsen K
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis.
    Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Penrose M; de Lisle GW; Letesson JJ; Garin-Bastuji B; Searson J; Fossati CA; Cloeckaert A
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):257-70. PubMed ID: 8748541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections].
    Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serological reactions to Brucella species in British pigs.
    Wrathall AE; Broughton ES; Gill KP; Goldsmith GP
    Vet Rec; 1993 May; 132(18):449-54. PubMed ID: 8517004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
    Kittelberger R; Bundesen PG; Cloeckaert A; Greiser-Wilke I; Letesson JJ
    Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a western blotting assay to discriminate Brucella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 infections in sheep.
    Corrente M; Desario C; Greco G; Buonavoglia D; Pratelli A; Madio A; Scaltrito D; Consenti B; Buonavoglia C
    New Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15164626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The serological relationship between Escherichia coli O157 and Yersinia enterocolitica O9 using sera from patients with brucellosis.
    Chart H; Okubadejo OA; Rowe B
    Epidemiol Infect; 1992 Feb; 108(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 1547843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
    Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
    Dieste-Pérez L; Blasco JM; De Miguel MJ; Marín CM; Barberán M; Conde-Álvarez R; Moriyón I; Muñoz PM
    Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 168(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24331743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The antigenic relationship between Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:3 and 0:9].
    Kocabeyoğlu O
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1990 Jul; 24(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 1704479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Contribution to the differentiation of cross-reacting antibodies in brucellosis serology--1. Reactions with various Yersinia serotypes and antibody avidity].
    Staak C; Draeger A; Bahn P; Nöckler K
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Oct; 113(10):361-7. PubMed ID: 11084752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.
    Jungersen G; Sørensen V; Giese SB; Stack JA; Riber U
    Epidemiol Infect; 2006 Apr; 134(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 16490140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification and characterization of immunodominant antigens during the course of infection with Brucella ovis.
    Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; de Lisle GW; Cloeckaert A; de Bruyn J
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 1995 Apr; 7(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 7619904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.
    Erdenebaatar J; Bayarsaikhan B; Watarai M; Makino S; Shirahata T
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2003 Jul; 10(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 12853409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-reactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp.
    Bonfini B; Chiarenza G; Paci V; Sacchini F; Salini R; Vesco G; Villari S; Zilli K; Tittarelli M
    Vet Ital; 2018 Jun; 54(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 30019327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of Brucella serotype A and M and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 polysaccharides for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle, sheep, and goats.
    Díaz-Aparicio E; Aragón V; Marín C; Alonso B; Font M; Moreno E; Pérez-Ortiz S; Blasco JM; Díaz R; Moriyón I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3136-41. PubMed ID: 8308104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera.
    Corbel MJ; Stuart FA; Brewer RA
    Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():341-8. PubMed ID: 6489620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.