These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8203246)

  • 1. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():7-14. PubMed ID: 8203246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():15-22. PubMed ID: 8203219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Yamazaki Y; Yokota M; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Itoh S; Watanabe T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():6-10. PubMed ID: 8740802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detectability of amplitude-modulation following response at different carrier frequencies.
    Aoyagi M; Furuse H; Yokota M; Kiren T; Suzuki Y; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():23-7. PubMed ID: 8203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence.
    Aoyagi M; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Furuse H; Watanabe T; Ito T
    Audiol Neurootol; 1999; 4(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 9873150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Kim Y; Suzuki Y; Fuse T; Koike Y
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):253-61. PubMed ID: 8458756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency specificity of amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase spectral analysis.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Kim Y; Suzuki Y; Fuse T; Koike Y
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):293-301. PubMed ID: 8216028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study on the phase spectral analysis of middle latency response and 40-Hz event-related potential in central nervous system disorders.
    Harada J; Aoyagi M; Suzuki T; Kiren T; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():34-9. PubMed ID: 8203240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dependence of "amplitude modulation following response" on attention].
    Pethe J; Mühler R; von Specht H
    HNO; 2001 Mar; 49(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 11320620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults using the AMFR.
    Chambers RD; Meyer TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 8422480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response elicited by 1,000-Hz filtered clicks.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):181-95. PubMed ID: 2222287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental study on the generator of amplitude-modulation following response.
    Kiren T; Aoyagi M; Furuse H; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():28-33. PubMed ID: 8203239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The progress in the study on auditory evoked potentials].
    Chen F; Yang XP; Fan LH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 27(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 21899015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates.
    Riquelme R; Kuwada S; Filipovic B; Hartung K; Leonard G
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 16518139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Amplitude modulation following response (AMFR)--a method for objective frequency specific audiologic diagnosis].
    Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Lottmann JK
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8851115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
    Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by clicks masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 1449430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Near-threshold recordings of amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR) in children of different ages.
    Pethe J; Mühler R; Siewert K; von Specht H
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 15457816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.