These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8203391)
1. Admissibility of scientific testimony into evidence. Brushwood DB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Mar; 51(5):683-5. PubMed ID: 8203391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bendectin case dismissed. Barinaga M Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5195):167. PubMed ID: 7809619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Court ruling on 'junk science' gives judges more say about what expert witness testimony to allow. Marwick C JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):423. PubMed ID: 8320770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the admissibility of expert testimony. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Jan; 45(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 8125472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Daubert v Merrell Dow. The Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom. Gold JA; Zaremski MJ; Lev ER; Shefrin DH JAMA; 1993 Dec 22-29; 270(24):2964-7. PubMed ID: 8018140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dr. Brent and scientific debate. Newman SA Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 10453908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court to weigh science. Marshall E Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):588-90. PubMed ID: 8338515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response to Dr. Brent's commentary on "Dr. Brent and scientific debate". Newman SA Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10532797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bendectin: review of the medical literature of a comprehensively studied human nonteratogen and the most prevalent tortogen-litigen. Scialli AR Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):239. PubMed ID: 10453907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Science, law, and the search for truth in the courtroom: lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow. Bertin JE; Henifin MS J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(1):6-20. PubMed ID: 8173660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Daubert v. Merrell Dow: missed opportunity. Jackson KA Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):71-93. PubMed ID: 10342987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Debendox in the dock. Brown A Nurs Mirror; 1980 Feb; 150(8):8-9. PubMed ID: 6899313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Debendox is not thalidomide. Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):205-6. PubMed ID: 6146759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of drug therapy for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Huff PS J Fam Pract; 1980 Nov; 11(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 7005391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The debendox saga. Orme ML Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6500):918-9. PubMed ID: 3929963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bendectin: a case of mourning sickness. Hays DP Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Nov; 17(11):826-7. PubMed ID: 6641507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]